Constitutional Consistency

Submitted by Ted R. Weiland (United States), Oct 17, 2010 at 09:07

Consistency, as it pertains to Amendment 1, demands that Constitutionalists assert that Islam is not a religion, and yet Wilders case is based upon the fact that "Criticism [of religion] is allowed." Hmm!

Please take the time to listen to The Biblical Answer to the Islaminization of America at http://www.kingdompromises.org/kingdompromises_audio/islaminization2.mp3 and The Biblical Answer to the Mosque at Ground Zer at http://www.kingdompromises.org/kingdompromises_audio/mosque.mp3.

For more information regarding these important issues, please visit our website.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".