Why must one adapt to the least productive human group to qualify?

Submitted by IamJoseph (Australia), Sep 24, 2012 at 04:48

If one was raised in an Islamic country, they would be forbidden to criticise Islam - aka they would have no comparative knowledge of truth. This makes any Islamic input on Islam null and void. We see no Muslims beheading Muslims for speaking falsehoods [denial of 9/11, the Holocaust, the Jewish temple, the Jewish connection to Hebron, etc, etc].

We see no Muslims beheading Muslims for disrespect to the older beliefs of Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists. We see only raging hordes with bloody eyes and gnarling teeth screaming someone dared to disrespect their Prophet. We see screaming hordes of invented Pretend Palestinians that Jews robbed their land - not, of Arab Muslims who robbed Jewish land and persecuted Jews in Arab lands - and this when some 23 fictitious Islamic states which never existed before were created 110 years ago, in secret with none voted for at the UN, when oil was discovered.

We see Muslims doing what Muslims do all over the world - from Texas to Thailand. They are screaming Islam will dominate the world - immediately after they dominate making humous. Clearly, Muslims cannot blow their own trumpet and forbid anyone else doing so. An Islamic expert can only come from a non-Muslim. A Muslim talking about Muslims is forbidden. Bite the bullet.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".