From Obama to Israel the Plan A "Hegelian Dialectic" Vs Plan B from Islamists -where's the differnce?

Submitted by David MacKAY (Canada), Mar 4, 2013 at 15:36

Your alternative title for this piece was "Hagelian Dialectic" and you say it is your fantasy title for the column, reference the German philosopher, F Hegel and his dialectic theory of history. You are correct that in the Hagelian schema, Israel is the thesis, Obama the antithesis, and the Pentagon the synthesis. You might want however to refer to the Hegelian Dialectic as Obama's "Plan "A" Final solution?"

I say this because it is inescapable that Plan "A" forces Israel into accommodating Islamist and anti semitic aims whereas Plan "B" is the more abrupt Islamist/Salafist plan for a solution for both Christians and Jews which is found in the Koran and protectively administered under Sharia.

The Zionists are as usual critical (a good thing) in their view of Obama's appointments; whereas the silence from Jewish Moderates and liberals in AIPAC suggests there is now in the Jewish majority a fear of Obama in that AIPAC seeks to appease Obama and by default has now become accommodating to the bigger stuff in anti-semitic hegemony they had formerly stood against.

AIPAC is beginning to look like the Liberal Jewish attitudes precluding the "Night mare Years" of the Weimar republic - and four more years to go.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".