|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mind-bendingReader comment on item: When AIPAC Went AWOL Submitted by john w. mcginley (United States), Mar 5, 2013 at 17:13 Mr. Pipes! This was one of your better and stranger, both, postings. Machiavellian (sp?). I suspect that Mr. Hagel has been tamed by the process. And, to a lesser extent, President Obama himself. One of the very good dimensions on all of this is the military strength of Israel and the fact that Israel, if needed, will take care of Itself. Further, whoever goes up against Israel will "give" more than it will receive. Speaking of Machiavellian. Do you recall that Israeli Intelligence in the US had uncovered the 9//11 plot about two days before 9/11. My understanding is that the information was relayed to the Bush Administration at some level lower than the President himself. The US people who received this would not act on this (or even report on this to the President) until US Intelligence could verify such. ((There appeared to be a sense that the US officials involved did not want to be beholden to Israel and, as well, were "po-d" that Israeli Intelligence was so much ahead of US Intelligence.)) Of course, all this delay -- and not wanting Israel to take the credit resulted in having no time to thwart the well-planned strike. anything to this? Hegel's "Dialectic" was influential but in point of fact it was third-rate Philosophy. Don't worry about HAgelian Dialectic. He is totally beholden to Obama. But, it is true that if Obama goes anti-Israeli in a big way -- and he just might -- Hagel will do all the foot-work and more to please that narcissist. Submitting....
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (20) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |