Least of evils?

Submitted by Objective Observer (United States), Jan 10, 2014 at 17:59

As you've noted all the Middle East hot spots it's interesting to note that neither he nor Obama has addressed a single one, never mind substantively. In some ways, it appears that's best, or he would almost certain back those whose intentions toward America and Israel are most malign...as it any are not to some degree. Sigh, least of evils.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".