Is the Qur'an "flawless"? Read and laugh

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Apr 10, 2014 at 18:01

Our dear Hussam is going through the Islamic twists and turns and this is what he is coming up with

1. Argument from "You must believe me because Arabic is my first language" and for this I would say Mashallah but would he use a dictionary to prove a point? May the Gods forbid

2. Argument from "But you must read what the Ulama say" And for this i say Sobhanallah and when I provide him with what his revered sources are saying about these disasters he repeats this mantra "But you must read what the Ulama say" but would he read what al-Tabari or Ibn Kathir are saying about these disasters? May the Gods forbid.

3. Argument from but this is "figuratively speaking" and when I provided him with what al-Tabari says about the silly aya where Allah blew his soul in the vagina of Mary the Ulama were horrified and provided us with a cockamamie story about Gabriel and not Allah who did this blowing and this blowing was done in her pocket because it is a big disaster to admit that the Qur'an is saying that Allah blew his soul in the vagina of a mere human being so what is figuratively speaking about this disaster our dear Hussam and how come al-Tabari did not tell us that this is really not a literally speaking you tell us our dear Hussam

So I'm going to help you our dear Hussam the following will be accepted as evidence

1. Arabic language dictionaries

2. Tafseer al-Qur'an by Abn kathir and al-Tabari and al-Qurtubi

The following will not be accepted as evidence:

1, The ... Zakir Naik said so

2. My Mullah said so

3. I Hussam say so because I Hussam speak Arabic

4. Ambassador Akbar Zeb of Pakistan said so

Deal?

Now the Qur'an is a confused and confusing book and here are some of the problems

1. Mistakes in Arabic grammar as in the case of the Quranic disaster ان هذان لساحران tsk...tsk...tsk let us fix this poor Arabic ان هاذين لساحران

2. Mistakes in the spelling of words as in الرحمن tsk...tsk...tsk... let us fix it الرحمان oh and while we are at it al-Tabari tells us that الرحيم should be الراحم

And let us not forget the word بسم tsk....tsk...tsk... it should be باسم oh you do not believe me? Read the word in سورة العلق 1

What a disaster the author of the Qur'an cannot spell

3. Poor syntax as in the Quranic disaster known as التفات as Q4:3 and it is as follows

وان خفتم الا تقسطوا في اليتامى

Then we have the second part of this literary disaster

فأنكحوا ماطاب لكم من النساء مثنى وثلاث ورباع

What a disaster after all what do orphans have to do with you having sex with two, three or four you tell me

But wait are you aware that the etymology of the word Qist is really from the name of the emperor Constantine this means that Constantine made it to al-Lawh al-Mahfuz and what a disaster

For the readers this literary disaster is regarded by Muslims as a miracle! I call this stupid

4. More literary disasters is what is called by your Ulama as الكلام المكرر or Allah is in the habit of repeating himself ad nauseum and we are told because التكرار يعلم الحمار so your Allah is saying that Muslims are حمير so are Muslims حمير? And Sheikh al-Azhar tells us that if الكلام المكرر is removed from the Qur'an it would shrink to the size of a small كراسة or the Qur'an will become a little booklet

5. Foreign words in the Qur'an as in the case of the word الطور which is really not an Arabic word but a Syriac word ܛܘܪܐ and even al-Tabari tells us that it is not an Arabic word and that it is a Syriac word but wait your Allah says that the Qur'an is a قرآن عربي and he does not say it is a قرآن سرياني so who is the liar here? and the silly argument that al-Tur is now an Arabic word is ridiculous because we have a perfect Arabic word for mountain and it is جبل and how come Allah did not use it? and when was the last time you used the word Tur instead of جبل? Let me guess never

Oh would you like me to provide you with more foreign words from the Qur'an?

6. Strange words that no one has a clue what they mean the likes of Kalala and Hanana and al-Raqeem and Ghasleen and Ilaf but I love these two words حصحص and the word عصعص and now let me help you these two words are the same words and it is from Syriac ܥܨܥܨ or Syriac ayn followed by Syriac Sadhe and here is the Syriac ayn ܥ which was read by Muslim scribes if they knew Syriac as Arabic ayn ع and the ܨ or Sadhe was read as Arabic Qaf (as in the case of Surat Qaf) or correctely as Arabic sad ص but because the morphology of the Syriac ayn ܥ looks like the morphology of Arabic ح it was also read by mistake as ح and not the correct ع et voila we have the حصحص and عصعص

Do you know what this means? it means that your so called Qur'an was written in this case in Syriac now do you get it? Now what does the word ܥܨܥܨ mean no one has a clue and why is that our dear Hussam? it also means that it is a blatant lie to claim that the Qur'an was orally transmitted and more evidence that the Qur'an was no more than a written text the origins of which was lost by the time al-Tabari was trying to entangle all this mess

7. Flawed theology as in the case of الناسخ والمنسوخ and القضاء والقدر after all why would Allah change his mind and what is the value of this life if Allah pre-planned every thing

But most strange is that the Qur'an says as I proved to you that Jesus is God

8. Flawed chronology as in the case of Qur'an 79:30 where al-Tabari tells us that the word بعد should be مع or Allah has no clue about the chronology of his own creation oh it is "The earth is flat verse too"

9. This brings us to bogus science as in is the earth flat as it says in Q79:30 and does the sun and the moon orbit the flat and stationary earth? Does that make sense to you?

I can go on and on our dear Hussam but so much for the flawless Qur'an

Oh do not go away as we kuffar need to expose islam and the God if islam and the prophet of Islam

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".