|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RT coverage is slanted against IsraelReader comment on item: Are Millions Worldwide Protesting Israeli Actions? Submitted by Michael S (United States), Jul 23, 2014 at 12:39 RT is one of my bookmarks, which I often read to get a balanced point of view. It is, of course, Russian state propaganda; but then, most news sites are state and private BS. Here are some of today's headlines there concerning Israel: "Anonymous pledges more cyber-breaches over Israeli attacks" (anti-Israel, portraying the victims as the aggressors) "Palestinians are Warsaw Ghetto prisoners of today" (disgustingly anti-Israel and anti-Semitic headline) "Former UN Amb. Bill Richardson on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict..." (I haven't read the article; though it's journalistic dishonesty to label the current conflict as "Israeli-Palestinian". It is Israel vs. anti-Israel terrorists, particularly HAMAS. Israel is not fighting its Palestinian Arab population) Compared with blatantly anti-Semitic countries, such as the UK, these Russian headlines are mild indeed; but they are very slanted. For reference, analogous BBC headlines are: "France jails pro-Palestinian rioters" "Thousands march over Gaza crisis" "We don't want civilians to die" "French Jews afraid to be Jewish" "Hospital on conflict's front line" There is a hint of impartiality in the above; but beneath the extremely thin veneer is the sickeningly sweet Pally narrative of "Israeli aggression against innocents". RT is a breath of fresh air. by comparison. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (22) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |