Helping our dear Dawudi

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 1, 2014 at 12:21

The little chat that our dear Wasim and our dear Dawudi is really funny

Actually, I am interested in knowing about not only about validity of "Literary Sources"

Well let me help you our dear Dawudi we do not have any extant literary sources no papyri or ostraca or monuments that would help us to reconstruct what really happened in al-Hijaz when Quthm ibn Ibd al-Lat was alive

See? we kuffar can help

but way by which Muhmmad transmitted his ideology despite of big forgery in Islamic History.

You hit the nail on the head our dear Dawud without knowing Muslim history as transmitted by the Islamic historical tradition is the biggest literary fraud in the history of mankind and conclusions based on fraud are no more than fraud

Your arguments about Ali as not part of chain of succession following first three KHALIF

ROTFL Pakistani Arabic it is al-Khulafa' and why was his name Ali any guesses?

, if hold true who are these AL KHULFA AL RASHIDUN ?

Well if you believe al-Tabari and Ibn Ishaq and al-Waqidi then they are Othman and Omar al-Faruq and Ali and Abu Bakr now did they indeed exit and are they real historical characters? Well if they were then how come the extant Islamic sources are silent about them? Any guesses? could it be because they never existed?

and Dhimmi no more ,

Yes our dear Dawudi whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by the Muslim invaders of India

I don't consider arguments or speculations of anyone are of no value !

And why is that our dear Dawudi whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by the Muslim invaders of India? could it be because you cannot refute what I'm saying

Here on this forum everyone can argue by his logic .

And speaking of logic: What logic? Is this the logic of you or our dear Wasim?

If logic fails ,argument will false

Logic is based on knowledge and an argument is based on knowledge. You and our dear Wasim? you are both beyond help

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".