The Arab invasion of al-Maghreb and half knowledge is dangerous

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Oct 24, 2014 at 08:29

Our dear Bellator wrote

There is actually no evidence whatsoever that Arab and Berber grazing patterns caused deforestation and desertification in North Africa.

References please

This is a French colonial era myth, meant to perpetuate the notion that the natives were lazy and wasteful, and in need of "civilizing" and "sedentarization" policy imposed by the white man.

References please

The truth of the matter is that North Africa looked exactly the same when Arabs invaded:

Where is your evidence hard and solid evidence

the myth of the "Rome's granary" is based on the selective descriptions of ancient writers, not on any actual biological research: and the actual amounts of grains that the Romans extracted from North Africa are not remarkable and indeed North Africa under the Muslims significantly outproduced the "roman granary", both today and in the past.

Where is your evidence

If you actually went there and asked the locals if their terrain has changed in the recent decades, they'd tell you it hasn't changed at all.

Where is your reference?

What really effects the situation is rainfall, not grazing patterns, since the locals already know not strain any single area by overgrazing.

Where is your reference?

You see our dear Bellator talk in cheap so you provide us with evidence and references or and you must pardon me shut up

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".