A Polite Traitor

Submitted by UNCLE VLADDI (Canada), May 2, 2016 at 18:42

Ted Cruz may act "dignified" but as a first-term Senator and non-natural-born US citizen who has sealed many of his own records, exactly like Obama did, he too lacks the "experience" necessary to lead.

Goldman-Sachs-backed CFR globalist bankster shill Ted Cruz is leading the charge to destroy America.

Cruz committed major treason by pimping the un-Constitutional Corker "fast-track" scam. The American Constitution says Congress makes treaties and must approve them by a 2/3 majority for them to take effect (and treaties abrogate the Constitution!) - so it's a pure case of Golden-Rule legislation: silence does NOT mean assent. But the Corker fast-track treason - again: pimped by Cruz - reverses that onus so now 2/3 actually have to show up to vote against whatever "treaty" Caliph MuBarak Hussein Osama wants to use to change the Constitution - or it automatically passes!

Not only does this mere "law" purport to illegally reverse the clear terms of rights and responsibilities of congress as set out in the Constitution itself, but it's also clearly a vile attempt at TREASON, in that it undermines the American system of government itself!

Senator Jeff Sessions just released his latest "High Alert" press release. In it, he told the truth about the TPA that Ted Cruz and Barack Obama have been trying to keep secret. It is posted in full below, and we bolded some particularly egregious details about the TPA.

CRITICAL ALERT: FAST-TRACK WOULD PRE-APPROVE FORMATION OF SWEEPING TRANSNATIONAL UNION

Promoters of fast-track executive authority have relied on semantic obfuscation in an effort to deny the obvious: the President's top priority is obtaining fast-track authority because he knows it will expand his powers and allow him to cement his legacy through the formation of a new political and economic union. If, as promoters amazingly suggest, the President had more powers without fast-track, he would veto it. The authority granted in "Trade Promotion Authority" is authority transferred from Congress to the Executive and, ultimately, to international bureaucrats.

The entire purpose of fast-track is for Congress to surrender its power to the Executive for six years. Legislative concessions include: control over the content of legislation, the power to fully consider that legislation on the floor, the power to keep debate open until Senate cloture is invoked, and the constitutional requirement that treaties receive a two-thirds vote. Legislation cannot even be amended.

By contrast, without fast-track, Congress retains all of its legislative powers, individual members retain all of their procedural tools, and every single line, jot, and tittle of trade text is publicly available before any congressional action is taken.

It lets Obama make UNCHALLENGED unchangeable "treaties" with the UN to take your guns, and with Iran to make sure your families will enjoy nuclear fallout!

And this is the guy you want to be your next President?!

Cruz is too young and too inexperienced. He is a first term Senator, a smooth talking lawyer, and no more than a young punk. He doesn't have the experience to lead and manage. He hasn't built or run squat. This is only his first term and he already has undisclosed bank loans.

In researching Heidi Cruz, I found (national review online) She volunteered for G.W. Bush prez election--paved way for multiple posts ending in culminating her post as National Security Council.

And YES borrowed cash from Goldman Sacs.

As of Jan 15, 2016 Cruz is still indebted to G.S. for somewhere between 50 thousand and 100 thousand.

Henry Paulsen and Timothy Geitner both from G.S. went to G.W. for billions of bank bailouts and NAILED IT! (Taxpayer expense of course) G.W. said at the time this decision is to be questioned by NO ONE!!! Cannot be taken to court. (The king has spoken)

Ted Cruz said he would not send Muslims back--that is Congress decision--(if it was illegal for an Exec decision, righting a wrong should involve a pen and a phone) Ahem!! (Cruz switched positions).

CRUZ:

1. FINANCED his campaign for senate with two half-million dollar loans (which he hid from the FEC and the public) from the GLOBALIST CFR corporate sponsors, Goldman Sachs and CitiBank
2. Upon taking office he offers THREE cheap labor amendments to the Gang of Eight Bill which would cost THOUSANDS of AMERICAN workers their jobs can you spell GLOBALIST?)
a. DOUBLING Immigration quotas
b. Increasing foreign work visas by 500%
c. Allowing current illegals residingin the US to STAY here legally and work.
(so far it isn't looking good for an AMERICA FIRST narrative)
3. Partnered up with the RINO Paul Ryan to publish a PRO-Fast Track op-ed in the WSJ which he then voted to send to the senate floor right into the hands of Mitch McConnell!
(there goes the CONSTITUTIONALIST mantle in that he preferred to trust Obama with these negotiations rather than CONGRESS following through with their constitutional authority)
4. His current campaign is heavily financed by these CFR corporate sponsors
a. Goldman Sachs (where his wife works)
b. CitiGroup (where have I heard that name before?)
c. Merrill Lynch/BOA
d. J.P. Morgan

(Hey we shouldn't ASSUME Cruz is OWNED by these Wall Street goons just because he has taken over fifty million dollars from them!)

Does CFR Ted support building The Wall? ....no.
Does CFR Ted support banning all Muslim immigration? ....no.
Is CFR Ted's campaign staff infested with Goldman-Sachs employees? ...yes.
Did CFR Ted support TPP? ---yes.
Did CFR Ted support H-1B visas? ...yes.?
Did Mrs. CFR Ted co-author "North American Community" for CFR? ---yes.

CFR Ted is "controlled opposition." He is the last chance of the globalists for a Republican nominee. I don't care if Cruz was born in Betsy Ross's panties.

As others before me have noted, he is the enemy as much as Hillary.

In fact, a vote for Ted Cruz IS a vote for HIllary!

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".