69 million page views

A Polite Traitor

Reader comment on item: Ted Cruz for President

Submitted by UNCLE VLADDI (Canada), May 2, 2016 at 18:42

Ted Cruz may act "dignified" but as a first-term Senator and non-natural-born US citizen who has sealed many of his own records, exactly like Obama did, he too lacks the "experience" necessary to lead.

Goldman-Sachs-backed CFR globalist bankster shill Ted Cruz is leading the charge to destroy America.

Cruz committed major treason by pimping the un-Constitutional Corker "fast-track" scam. The American Constitution says Congress makes treaties and must approve them by a 2/3 majority for them to take effect (and treaties abrogate the Constitution!) - so it's a pure case of Golden-Rule legislation: silence does NOT mean assent. But the Corker fast-track treason - again: pimped by Cruz - reverses that onus so now 2/3 actually have to show up to vote against whatever "treaty" Caliph MuBarak Hussein Osama wants to use to change the Constitution - or it automatically passes!

Not only does this mere "law" purport to illegally reverse the clear terms of rights and responsibilities of congress as set out in the Constitution itself, but it's also clearly a vile attempt at TREASON, in that it undermines the American system of government itself!

Senator Jeff Sessions just released his latest "High Alert" press release. In it, he told the truth about the TPA that Ted Cruz and Barack Obama have been trying to keep secret. It is posted in full below, and we bolded some particularly egregious details about the TPA.

CRITICAL ALERT: FAST-TRACK WOULD PRE-APPROVE FORMATION OF SWEEPING TRANSNATIONAL UNION

Promoters of fast-track executive authority have relied on semantic obfuscation in an effort to deny the obvious: the President's top priority is obtaining fast-track authority because he knows it will expand his powers and allow him to cement his legacy through the formation of a new political and economic union. If, as promoters amazingly suggest, the President had more powers without fast-track, he would veto it. The authority granted in "Trade Promotion Authority" is authority transferred from Congress to the Executive and, ultimately, to international bureaucrats.

The entire purpose of fast-track is for Congress to surrender its power to the Executive for six years. Legislative concessions include: control over the content of legislation, the power to fully consider that legislation on the floor, the power to keep debate open until Senate cloture is invoked, and the constitutional requirement that treaties receive a two-thirds vote. Legislation cannot even be amended.

By contrast, without fast-track, Congress retains all of its legislative powers, individual members retain all of their procedural tools, and every single line, jot, and tittle of trade text is publicly available before any congressional action is taken.

It lets Obama make UNCHALLENGED unchangeable "treaties" with the UN to take your guns, and with Iran to make sure your families will enjoy nuclear fallout!

And this is the guy you want to be your next President?!

Cruz is too young and too inexperienced. He is a first term Senator, a smooth talking lawyer, and no more than a young punk. He doesn't have the experience to lead and manage. He hasn't built or run squat. This is only his first term and he already has undisclosed bank loans.

In researching Heidi Cruz, I found (national review online) She volunteered for G.W. Bush prez election--paved way for multiple posts ending in culminating her post as National Security Council.

And YES borrowed cash from Goldman Sacs.

As of Jan 15, 2016 Cruz is still indebted to G.S. for somewhere between 50 thousand and 100 thousand.

Henry Paulsen and Timothy Geitner both from G.S. went to G.W. for billions of bank bailouts and NAILED IT! (Taxpayer expense of course) G.W. said at the time this decision is to be questioned by NO ONE!!! Cannot be taken to court. (The king has spoken)

Ted Cruz said he would not send Muslims back--that is Congress decision--(if it was illegal for an Exec decision, righting a wrong should involve a pen and a phone) Ahem!! (Cruz switched positions).

CRUZ:

1. FINANCED his campaign for senate with two half-million dollar loans (which he hid from the FEC and the public) from the GLOBALIST CFR corporate sponsors, Goldman Sachs and CitiBank
2. Upon taking office he offers THREE cheap labor amendments to the Gang of Eight Bill which would cost THOUSANDS of AMERICAN workers their jobs can you spell GLOBALIST?)
a. DOUBLING Immigration quotas
b. Increasing foreign work visas by 500%
c. Allowing current illegals residingin the US to STAY here legally and work.
(so far it isn't looking good for an AMERICA FIRST narrative)
3. Partnered up with the RINO Paul Ryan to publish a PRO-Fast Track op-ed in the WSJ which he then voted to send to the senate floor right into the hands of Mitch McConnell!
(there goes the CONSTITUTIONALIST mantle in that he preferred to trust Obama with these negotiations rather than CONGRESS following through with their constitutional authority)
4. His current campaign is heavily financed by these CFR corporate sponsors
a. Goldman Sachs (where his wife works)
b. CitiGroup (where have I heard that name before?)
c. Merrill Lynch/BOA
d. J.P. Morgan

(Hey we shouldn't ASSUME Cruz is OWNED by these Wall Street goons just because he has taken over fifty million dollars from them!)

Does CFR Ted support building The Wall? ....no.
Does CFR Ted support banning all Muslim immigration? ....no.
Is CFR Ted's campaign staff infested with Goldman-Sachs employees? ...yes.
Did CFR Ted support TPP? ---yes.
Did CFR Ted support H-1B visas? ...yes.?
Did Mrs. CFR Ted co-author "North American Community" for CFR? ---yes.

CFR Ted is "controlled opposition." He is the last chance of the globalists for a Republican nominee. I don't care if Cruz was born in Betsy Ross's panties.

As others before me have noted, he is the enemy as much as Hillary.

In fact, a vote for Ted Cruz IS a vote for HIllary!

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (82) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Race and Politics in America [372 words]Raul MarksMay 15, 2016 15:50229474
Separate reality from Campignese [171 words]Michael SMay 16, 2016 03:51229474
Iran Deal [5 words]JakeMay 11, 2016 14:17229407
1I'm voting for Trump, and am fed up with the others [620 words]Michael SMay 13, 2016 11:17229407
Trump can't be trusted on Israel [193 words]Raul MarksMay 20, 2016 19:54229407
Reading a closed book [56 words]Michael SMay 23, 2016 11:07229407
1Ted Cruz duplicity [59 words]JakeMay 11, 2016 14:09229406
WV, NE primaries and general polls [282 words]Anne JulienneMay 11, 2016 00:34229403
President Sanders [147 words]Michael SMay 13, 2016 02:59229403
I have a different view of God .. [109 words]Anne JulienneMay 16, 2016 02:48229403
Wrestling with God [811 words]Michael SMay 20, 2016 12:50229403
wrestling is not compatible with absolute confidence [70 words]Anne JulienneMay 22, 2016 19:41229403
To whom shall we go? [420 words]Michael SMay 23, 2016 02:38229403
Absolute Confidence Defeats the Need to Wrestle with the Sovereign Almighty [128 words]M ToveyMay 24, 2016 18:57229403
1OMG [28 words]Anne JulienneMay 26, 2016 02:03229403
to you your certainty, to me my wrestling [11 words]Anne JulienneMay 26, 2016 05:56229403
Your're Right- Its Not My Will That is Being Exercised Over the Destiny Of Israel [87 words]M ToveyMay 26, 2016 10:11229403
Michael Row the Boat Ashore; A waste of time [716 words]Michael SMay 30, 2016 22:26229403
respectful disagreement with Dr. Pipes [293 words]Charles MartelMay 10, 2016 23:05229402
Daniel raises an important issue [132 words]Michael SMay 13, 2016 03:33229402
View from Germany [125 words]Kaarsten BraaschMay 9, 2016 01:18229357
sure, the birthers are jerks [245 words]Anne JulienneMay 9, 2016 07:21229357
The real issues in the Republican Party [592 words]Michael SMay 10, 2016 19:05229357
Ted Cruz for President [129 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Ron BearmanMay 7, 2016 16:11229338
Why did Trump rise? [34 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Raul MarksMay 7, 2016 01:32229323
Presidential qualities [134 words]Susan H SomervilleMay 5, 2016 16:50229293
Response to Susan [196 words]AnonMay 7, 2016 05:11229293
Retort to "Anon" (India) [230 words]Susan H SomervilleMay 25, 2016 03:06229293
Trump [152 words]Frank LukeMay 4, 2016 18:51229285
1Hoping Pipes stays with the GOP [209 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Stu FaginMay 4, 2016 11:05229282
1I pity the conservatives [17 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Richard PreschelMay 4, 2016 03:00229273
1What Now? [84 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Gary SackMay 3, 2016 23:02229271
Tme to pause and consider [167 words]Michael SMay 4, 2016 03:37229271
thank you for the Peter Wehner article [252 words]Anne JulienneMay 5, 2016 00:40229271
A major distinction, important to consider [642 words]Michael SMay 6, 2016 09:51229271
war crimes ok with you then? [90 words]Anne JulienneMay 7, 2016 18:40229271
this is history, not prophecy [265 words]Anne JulienneMay 7, 2016 19:07229271
100% hyperboly [413 words]Michael SMay 9, 2016 03:58229271
You're talking about war. This is the way it's actually fought. [11 words]Michael SMay 9, 2016 04:01229271
talking about war [182 words]Anne JulienneMay 13, 2016 04:12229271
A spade is a spade [119 words]Michael SMay 16, 2016 03:24229271
an issue that runs very deep ... [432 words]Anne JulienneMay 20, 2016 04:11229271
War, the Bible and Ted Cruz [611 words]Michael SMay 23, 2016 12:34229271
going nowhere ... [10 words]Anne JulienneMay 26, 2016 05:55229271
still praying for "a surprise" [385 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Anne JulienneMay 3, 2016 20:53229268
Lucifer to Messy Bobby, over and out. [140 words]Michael SMay 4, 2016 04:12229268
I am voting for Trump in November. [85 words]PrashantMay 6, 2016 22:06229268
Character & Principles [24 words]Gary ClarkeMay 3, 2016 17:59229267
Cruz? [63 words]JudyMay 3, 2016 16:31229263
unfortunate choices [166 words]lippyMay 3, 2016 13:03229261
Anti-Semitism and Ted Cruz [103 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mike ShapiroMay 3, 2016 10:44229258
RELAX! [99 words]Joe FalkMay 5, 2016 10:59229258
There is much more on the table than personalities [872 words]Michael SMay 5, 2016 19:27229258
Who will win in November presidential elections [10 words]romanMay 6, 2016 22:57229258
Ted Cruz for President [87 words]Michael ArtwichMay 3, 2016 03:39229257
Dignity, Shmignity. How about a President who is willing to walk determindly and swing a big stick? [121 words]EdwardMay 3, 2016 03:33229256
Roll-On TRUMP TRAIN [30 words]Pat PatriotMay 3, 2016 02:02229255
Ted Cruz for President. [235 words]Anne USAMay 2, 2016 21:15229250
Trump v/s Cruz [106 words]Frank LukeMay 2, 2016 20:55229249
If Trump Becomes President [21 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
SamMay 2, 2016 19:50229246
Why some support Trump. [132 words]Michael SMay 2, 2016 19:20229245
we do all need someone "serious" in charge [339 words]Anne JulienneMay 2, 2016 19:03229244
4A Polite Traitor [970 words]UNCLE VLADDIMay 2, 2016 18:42229243
Looking forward to November [59 words]Michael SMay 2, 2016 17:05229239
why now? [90 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Timothy HadleyMay 2, 2016 16:25229237
Response to Hadley [57 words]AnonMay 5, 2016 21:01229237
It looks bad [124 words]Kepha HorMay 2, 2016 16:22229236
1Surprise of surprises [198 words]Regan HuffmanMay 2, 2016 16:20229235
Cruz or Nothing [163 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Martin SchaffelMay 2, 2016 16:16229234
Why does Trump get votes? [228 words]Doug MayfieldMay 2, 2016 16:02229233
3A vote for Cruz will put Hillary in the White House -- Only Trump can defeat her. [144 words]Haile StresserMay 2, 2016 15:17229229
Cruz Is A Religious Extremist [82 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Bill ONeillMay 2, 2016 14:15229227
Response to Bill ONeill [35 words]AnonMay 5, 2016 21:07229227
Dear Daniel ... [156 words]Les LevitanMay 6, 2016 18:46229227
"Ted Cruz is at least a Christian Extremist or perhaps a Christian Zealot", Really? [104 words]RoyMay 20, 2016 21:36229227
No Votes for Republicans [10 words]Samuel TenenbaumMay 2, 2016 13:10229225
Response [85 words]David G. Cannon, Ph.D.May 2, 2016 12:58229224
1Cruz is a loser [34 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
albertoMay 2, 2016 11:59229223
Here's The Bottom Line Question [158 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Gary SackMay 2, 2016 10:40229221
Yes, But People Like Populist Appeals [90 words]DaveMay 1, 2016 21:47229213
Iran deal, Obamacare etc [238 words]AnonMay 1, 2016 21:01229211
Keep on piping up! [78 words]GumBoochoMay 1, 2016 20:29229210

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)