For Moustapha and Ayat al-saif and anbiya and not ambiya part deux

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 27, 2006 at 06:33

And how many times do I have to say that it is vocalized as anbiya but to the untrained ears it very well could be ambiya but it is vocalized as :anbiya. Get over it.

Now your Allah in Q 3:80 the author(s) use(s) the word: al-nabiin (this is the rasm, alif, lam, nuun with a shadda and a fatha, beh with a kasra, yeh with a shadda, nuun with a fatha) and there are other instances of your Allah using the same word instead of the correct: Anbiya. How do you explain this my dear Moustapha? It is either your Allah or Muhammad or may be Gabriel are not faminliar with good Arabic grammar. But wait you can also blame the scribes as 'A'isha did (the blame the dog thing oh I forgot that dogs are nijis) in her infamous and lame execuse for such mistakes: "hadha 'amal al-kuttab 'akhta'oo fi al-kitab."!! I'm sure you will understand this little gem!!

So much for the Qur'an that is "kitab mubeen maktuub bi 'Arabi faseeh."!!

The dead give away that you know no Arabic is using I'rab to vocalize your ANB!!!

Well, in this case it seems that the "English sources" are more superior that your lame reference.

As for ayat al-saif even if this nasty and irrational dispensation (after all your Allah was inciting Muhammad to kill other human beings, and He Allah that is, could have forced the people of Mecca to change their minds and accept Muhmmmad as he is supposed to be omnipotent. In this case it seems that your Allah was not omnipotent) is limited to the smart people of Mecca that did not believe Muhammad to be a prophet of their God Allah the pre-Islamic Arabian pagan deity.

And who says that Islam does not incite violence.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".