For B. Mustapha (Rabina Mushil 'Aalihu) and the mother of all gems part deux

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 15, 2006 at 07:12

I wrote: "What makes you believe that the above interview (in The Daily Ummat (sic)) took place? pakistanis can be liars sometimes ..."

And your response was: "You (sic) what makes you believing with the above article?"

Yo: Did you really understand my question? I do not think so. So let me ask you the question one more time: What makes you believe that the above interview took place?

Then you wrote: "Oh I know"

No you do not.

Then you wrote: "because it was not in the washington post that conducted the interview."

Nonsense.

1. I do not read the washington post so stop assuming things but again I can only blame your madrassa education for you being very shallow.

2. Even if there is such an article published in the washington post there is no reason for me to believe it either. After all there was a famous scandal at the washington Post where a reporter wrote an article about pre-teens and heroin addiction which was pure fantasy. There is no reason for me to believe anything in the New York Times either. I think for myself. You? You believe an Arab that claimed that the God of the Universe spoke to him albeit via an angel! I see you believeing anything.

Then you wrote the following:

"you only want us to believe with your reports but not ours.."!!

Just amazing. What gave you the impression that I believe "our" reports and not "your" reports? This sentence alone betrays and you must pardon me your poor education. But I guess my answer here will go far above your head.

You are here to propagate a religion that brutalized your ancestors. I'm here to find the truth and expose Islamic fascists and foolish tablighees big difference. Shame.

More in part trois

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".