ECONOMICS AND SHARIAH LAW-A PLAN OF WORLD DOMINATION

Submitted by David J. Jonsson (United States), Dec 26, 2006 at 14:36

In your excellent article you mention a non-violent approach-- "lawful Islamism" that goes beyond small-scale terrorism as an approach to world domination. In my opinion, I believe that, like you, this is a strategy of World Domination. To explore further I would suggest my recent article Economics and Shariah Law-A Plan of World Domination <http://www.salemthesoldier.us/jonsson_shariah_economics.html>

It should be realized that the goal of the Islamists, following in the footsteps of Muhammad, is not so much to conquer the land but to Islmanize the populations. In so doing they seek to have the lands come under Shariah law and that the lands become dar al-Islam—the land of Islam and that all non-Muslims accept the status of Dhimmis—subservient to Muslim rule.

The Plan involves the incremental acceptance of basic tenants of Shariah law as applied to all aspects of life—the Islamic "Way of Life". This implies the desire to incrementally change the laws and ultimately the Constitution of the U.S. This requires the population to accept the new laws as equally valid and acceptable. Initially this will result in parallel legal systems and progressing from there with laws that may be applied locally and ultimately nationally. Jihad can be with the pen and the tongue, just as it can be the sword and the spear as Dr. Yusuf al-Qaradawia a spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood has said. Knowledge combined with economic control can be wielded with the precision of a sharp sword to effect any desired social/political change necessary for the fulfillment of Islam's goal.

David J. Jonsson-Author: Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad--From the Muslim Brotherhood to the Leftist/Marxist-Islamist Alliance.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".