Replace our dependence on OPEC oil financing the Jihad WWIII and Islam will die by its own sectarian violence.

Submitted by John Adam (United States), Dec 27, 2006 at 20:06

Neither Israel or USA need to fight a military war to end the Jihad of the Military Imperialistic Religion of Islam. Oil revenues finance from the oil rich Arab OPEC states obviously finance this Jihad. Even the manufacture of low tech AK47s and RPGs is far beyond the capabilities of Arab states. The alternative fuels to petroleum based fuels should be obvious for the USA. Even technology challenged President Bush mentioned switchgrass to produce ethanol from cellulose. However he spent over $300 Billion fighting a war in Iraq against suicidal Islamic clowns who could not get a date with a virgin any other way! That $300 billion could have gone a long way toward purchasing a bio-fuel solution to the Terrorism WWIII.

I have to wonder why Israel never thought of developing alternative fuel technology to cut off the supply of OPEC oil money that finances the Islamic Jihad against Israel and the Western World. Ethanol production in the USA will soon be 6 billion gallons and continues to increase at a 25% a year rate. However a better solution to Oil Addiction is BUTANOL, an alcohol fuel with about 24% more energy per gallon than ethanol and which can be used in an ordinary automobile without modifications.

The original biologic process for producing Butanol has been improved over the years and it is claimed that it could now be more economic to produce than ethanol. The original process to produce bio-butanol was developed by Chaim Weizmann. There are numerous studies that indicate that the USA could produce over 100 billion gallons of ethanol or butanol from crop waste and energy crops grown on currently unused land without impacting food production, http://feedstockreview.ornl.gov/pdf/billion_ton_vision.pdf.

I find it amusing that the original biologic process to produce butanol, ABE fermentation, helped the allies to win WWI & WWII. As a reward Britain supported its developer's Zionist group and led to the creation of Israel with Weizemann as its first President. Here are a few links to give you an idea of why butanol can help us win WWIII:

New two step fermentation to produce only butanol and hydrogen gas instead of acetone, butanol, and ethanol:
http://www.danielpipes.org>http://www.greencarcongress.com/2005/07/boosting_biomas.html

New genetic strains of bacteria to produce butanol more economically:
http://www.danielpipes.org>http://www.ilcorn.org/Corn_Products/Butanol/butanol.html

BP and DuPont to produce butanol:
http://www.danielpipes.org>http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2006-06...butanol_x.htm?csp=34

http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2006-06...butanol_x.htm?csp=34
http://www.danielpipes.org>http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/06/bp_and_dupont_t.html

Why BP and DuPont favor butanol over ethanol:
http://www.danielpipes.org>http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGI...fact_sheet_jun06.pdf

Comparison between alcohol fuels:
http://www.danielpipes.org>http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/farmmgt/05010.html which includes this information,

DOE report on Butanol Production from Biomass including economic feasibility compared to ethanol:
http://www.danielpipes.org>http://butanol.com/docs/EEI-DOE Butanol Final Report.pdf and
http://butanol.com/docs/EEI-DOE Butanol Final Report.pdf and
http://www.danielpipes.org>http://www.butanol.com/page6.html

Summary of recent University of Illinois study of butanol production:
http://www.danielpipes.org>http://www.ilcfar.org/research/display.cfm?project_id=425

By the way alcohol fuels do not contribute to "increased" levels of greenhouse gases and will work in Direct Alcohol Fuel Cells which could be used to power vehicles, http://www.danielpipes.org>http://www.acta-nanotech.com/market/commercial.aspx

Hydrogen is a bad joke as a fuel for vehicles from a generation, delivery, and storage standpoint!

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".