to Mr. octavio

Submitted by cassano (Canada), Jan 4, 2007 at 01:51

Hi Mr. Octavio

I don't know who FRED NIELSON is but it sounds to me like he does owe you a response. after all as we say in the south of Italy " it's not right to throw the stone then hide your hand .

On to the issue of miss Simone Clarke. why must she prove she is a multicultural ideologue just to satisfy the illustrious Guardian ? we hear about the guardian in Canada ( where I currently am ). Mr. Octavio is it not interesting how the left always fights for the rights of free speech , tolerance , acceptance and equality , as long as you agree with them. the left is totally dangerous because, make no mistake , the fascist is not the threat as time will prove in relation to modern events. it's the left that is the real threat ,they are Nazis. after all Nazis are politically left of center and hate the fascist who is politically right of center .

The left wing Nazis are counting on the basic decency of the majority [it bothers me not, as a right wing true believer, to say] which is politically in the center to push their agenda.

The left wing has something right in relation to the separation of church and state [ look at Iran ], but where they fail to make the connection is that multiculturalism dilutes their vision of a secular Europe, because multiculturalism dictates the respect of all cultural aspects of others. so what do you do when the culture in the case of Muslims , which do not believe in the separation of church and state and whose religion demands adherence to the Koran above all , which in my opinion undermines the national unity and will only lead to violent conflict. you of course understand that Europe is one, maybe two, American style 911 ‘s away from a total back lash against ethnic minorities .

Really, do people on the left realize that multi cultures are a natural thing for humans to engage in; in their own countries that's why different countries and cultures exist.

I also believe that we should stop using the word resist because I think most people are centralists and are really objecting to their own cultures being over run by interlopers. and why should they not be concerned ? lets face it ,some cultures like Muslims or even the Jewish people are resistant to integrating for fear of diluting their own cultures . and as such ,they make other people mistrust them. why should you accept someone who for one reason or another thinks that not accepting your way of life and culture is a good thing for them .

I look and see that people of all colors are able to engage in the same intellectual occupations, so it's obvious that color and race are not a factor in person's abilities. but I believe cultures are stronger than others. I personally believe that western culture is the greatest culture that has ever or will ever exist . why does the guardian dislike that position? after all any one who reaps the benefits of western culture or does not accept it's values should consider living where they would feel more comfortable, and stop forcing other peoples cultures down our throats .

When I go to vacation in other countries to relax, then I choose their culture. when people come to vacation or live in my county I expect the same, why does the guardian think that's improper.

Maybe the British people who love England should close the guardian down by any means possible, because here we can [from an outsiders point of view] see papers like the guardian as the fifth column, a pack of traders to the people of great Brittan [like Neville Chamberlain] and are selling the British nation out to the modern day vandals.

Good day Mr. Octavio

p.s all the above is not pointed to you but to the guardian who has been making a name for it's self and not for the good.

Cassano

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".