To susan

Submitted by Syed Kasim (Canada), Jan 5, 2007 at 00:06

Sorry you misread or I did not put enough words to explain my point. I just included the economy of the portion of the Muslims of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia and Malaysia. It is true that even though Muslims in general are poorer than any other community in India, one of the five richest people of India is a Muslim, the President of India is a technologist President.

Muslims are not adulterers as they are the sexually cleanest people of any communities as they are the least AIDS affected community in the world even though majority of them are poor.

>>The economy of indonesia and malaysia is THANKS to the ethic chinese NON-muslims.

There is no truth in the above statement.

>>The typical economies of a typical muslim country is : calling for western aid. See Egypt, see Morocco (50% literacy rate).

Sorry, those aids are bribes given by the west to the west-friendly dictators just to buy their support for dubious interests of the west in the Middle east ... like enslaving Palestinians.

>>EU needs turkey like a bullet in the head. Turkey "integrates" the muslim way, murdering millions of armenians and kicking every non-muslim out of turkey.

>>Google "armenian genocide" and "turkish capital tax"
>>also, take a look here about "The Assyrians in the Christian Asia Minor Holocaust"

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/71595

>>so that means that when you elect terrorists like ahmadinejad, mubarak, hamas, you really mean it!

The election of Ahmedinejad is the failure of the western diplomacy. When the US could elect a biblical mad crusader Bush as a president ... Ahmedinejad is the answer for the election of Bush. Anyway when a muslim group fights for the freedom and rights of muslims, the west calls them terrorists. 20 billion was the initial estimate of Iraq war .. but it crossed more than 300 billion already ... still no solution in sight .. real quagmire for the US .. really Bush is a mad biblical crusader.

The international community knows how many times(60-70) the US had to use its undomocratic veto power when its dubious interest in the Middle East(Israel-Palestinian conflict) faced opposition thru world opinion. A country uses its veto power only when its dubious interest does not align with the right legitimate interest of the rest of the world.

Mubarak is a west-friendly dictator for the west to continue its enslaving of the poor palestinian people. The real people support in Egypt is with the democratic Muslims Brotherhood. When Indonesia had a dictator it was very much friendly to the US but not after the indonesians elected their leaders democratically. So, the western policy for a Muslim world leader is that the west does not worry whether you kill your people or not but don't come in the way of the west's dubious interests in the Muslim world. Saddam was OK for the west until he did not talk about the rights of palestinians ... but he became enemy only when he sent missiles into Israel ....

So, all democratically elected leaders of the muslim world are labelled as terrorists by the west just because they don't go with the west's interests in the Muslim world.

Thanx
Syed Kasim

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".