69 million page views

Correlation between backwardness and advancement of islamism?

Reader comment on item: Muslims "Lagging Behind"

Submitted by Archimedes2 (Canada), Jan 12, 2007 at 18:27

Despite the lack of detail in this brief article, Daniel, I can't help noting an apparent relationship between the backwardness of the Islamic community and various countries and the state of advancement of the Islamist agenda. If we ignore the historically and officially muslim countries for the moment, consider that the islamist agenda is further advanced in Europe than in North America.

From all I know, it is further advanced in France than in England, and the social situation for muslims there is worse. But the situation for Muslims in North America is better, though the Islamist agenda is not as well advanced. Even more so, in both cases, in Australia, from the impression I have. Seems as the Islamist agenda advances, ironically, Muslims fare poorer.

Of course one might argue that, in spite of economic and social empowerment they are "faring poorly" in the strictly muslim countries because of backward ideological and political systems and extreme suppression of basic human rights, but to make this argument one must use a different scale. Also, the distinct situation in North America is probably singular, as muslim migration to North America is driven principally by educational and professional considerations.

Thus the majority of muslims coming here are already either highly skilled or educated, or in the process of becoming so. The migration to Europe has been driven largely by patterns of movement by migrant laborers, and so is analogous to, say, the situation of hispanics in the southwest USA. So it's hard to argue for some sort of natural continuum. Nevertheless, I think it would be interesting to develop some sort of "backwardness" scale and some sort of "Islamicization" scale, the first measuring indicators of poor educational, economic or lifestyle health among "average" members of a subclass of a society, and the second measuring the point to which a society has advanced in accordance with the contemporary Islamist agenda, and then plotting one against the other, across all countries for which reliable data can be obtained.

The first datum sounds to me very much like the scale used by the U.N. to rank the standard of living in various countries, and the same data might be mined and reprocessed to obtain the right data, except that I doubt the U.N. data separates cultural/religious subgroups within nations. The second datum requires the development of an appropriate scale, something like a numerical rendering of the "steps taken by non-Muslims to accommodate Islamists:" found at IslamistWatch.

As much information pertaining to these items are probably available through the internet a dedicated data-miner could compile these into numerical information of the sort needed. Of course there are other ways to read the data. In India, for example, would an Islamist not say that the Ummah is faring poorly because muslims are suppressed, and argue for Jihad on this basis? Does Islamism cause poor outlook for muslims, or does poor standard of living cause Islamism?

I think the answer lies in observing the difference between the Islamist/Jihadist reaction and the reaction of poor and oppressed groups of other religious backgrounds. Only the Islamists appear to respond to oppression by trying to take over the world (though some, as in the "freedom fighters" of South America, have fought local battles; there is a clear qualitative difference between the two...) Also, one must deal with the fact that there are two different sorts of "backwardness": there is the lack of advance to the 21st century, the "primitiveness" of societies, as observed in many Islamic nations today, even those with great wealth or technological capabilities; and there is the social, educational, and health prospects of a group. They would seem to be different things, though connected, and perhaps should correspond to distinct measures, although a composite variable could be built out of them to form a generalized indicator of abstract "backwardness". However the numbers are generated, diced and sliced, I would bet on a fairly direct relationship appearing from the data.

The point? It would suggest that islamists are Islam's worst enemies, that Muslims fare more poorly when the Islamists are given free reign. Faced with such data, could this possibly motivate the larger Muslim community in the west to actively oppose Islamists, radicals and Jihadists in their midst who are stirring up strife, dissent and disenfranchisement?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (54) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Palestinian Islamic Scholar at Al-Aqsa mosque ally calls to ERADICATE Hindus [34 words]PatelJun 13, 2022 19:51282542
Further evidence that there is no such thing as a local Islamic problem [310 words]PrashantJun 14, 2022 16:40282542
Which mother can raise a smarter kid? [96 words]PrashantJun 12, 2022 23:48282530
Understanding Modern Islam in Proper Context [130 words]M ToveyJun 7, 2022 11:16282382
Islamism resembles Bodie California [206 words]DaveJun 5, 2022 17:50282364
1Wilfred Cantwell Smith's thesis [369 words]PrashantMay 15, 2013 21:40206082
Two causes of Islamic prosperity: Plundering and oil [126 words]PrashantApr 5, 2018 20:36206082
3Sorry, but no, the muslim people will not rise up to be equals...because to do this they first need to dump the koran. [307 words]Phil GreendMay 28, 2010 16:49173490
Muslims and Islam are two different pictures [135 words]Ibrahim Abu BakarAug 16, 2010 21:54173490
The god that failed [59 words]donvanMay 19, 2010 15:44173109
THE OPRESSION OF WOMEN [223 words]AmmanieMay 8, 2008 16:56128141
Feminism Muslim style [912 words]ClaudioFeb 10, 2015 20:23128141
1Correlation between backwardness and advancement of islamism? [717 words]Archimedes2Jan 12, 2007 18:2772575
2Muslims Lagging Behind [178 words]Abdul KhanJan 10, 2007 16:5672302
1My Letter to the Newspaper [201 words]Vicki TidwellJan 8, 2007 19:3272107
LET'S BOYCOTT THE CAB DRIVERS [36 words]bernie naglerJan 7, 2007 02:4871940
1Radical and traditional Islam [173 words]Donald W. BalesJan 6, 2007 21:3771919
1More evidence of the lag - and the full explanation [500 words]cubedJan 3, 2007 12:3971533
Lies, damn lies and statistics. [100 words]ClaudioFeb 10, 2015 20:1271533
Would Muslim Economic Progress Boost Their Military Agenda? [50 words]Richard H. ShulmanDec 28, 2006 21:3370944
1Islamic technology [203 words]donvanJan 15, 2007 10:1570944
required reading [39 words]Donald ODec 27, 2006 20:3770828
1The position of women [160 words]Legal EagleDec 27, 2006 18:4770815
David and Goliath [37 words]Darwin BarrettDec 26, 2006 18:5470665
1Wilfred Cantwell Smith's remarks [87 words]H Mark RosenwassDec 26, 2006 17:1370636
Where the theoretical and the practical collide [195 words]David W. LincolnDec 26, 2006 14:0470619
1how the west could lose and muslims lagging behind [75 words]robert fusfeldDec 26, 2006 12:4670612
Islam lagging behind [62 words]steven LDec 26, 2006 11:5970604
A Scandalous Retreat [488 words]Abu NuwasDec 26, 2006 09:0070582
1Size of family [227 words]S A KapadiaDec 26, 2006 08:1870573
1"They do not realise the power of education." [27 words]SalauddeenDec 31, 2006 23:2870573
Apostate [15 words]S A KapadiaJan 3, 2007 22:1970573
1Islam's 'Golden Age' [121 words]bobbydDec 26, 2006 07:5270572
Excellent summary [32 words]MosheDec 26, 2006 05:3770565
British Muslims [69 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Iftikhar AhmadDec 26, 2006 04:2770562
2To Iftikhar Ahmad [116 words]VijayDec 27, 2006 04:1670562
2Iftikhar, what utter rubbish! [209 words]nick4693Jan 5, 2007 18:3170562
British Muslims [972 words]Iftikhar AhmadJan 7, 2007 14:2670562
2When will this nonsense end? [1121 words]nick4693Jan 8, 2007 04:3270562
1Iftikhar Ahmad, you are dead WRONG! [135 words]MosheJan 11, 2007 04:3070562
2cultural roots!! [62 words]donvanJan 15, 2007 10:2370562
2British Muslims..... [150 words]donvanJan 16, 2007 09:2970562
British Muslims [156 words]Iftikhar AhmadJan 16, 2007 18:0270562
2If you got the money, I got the time... [91 words]donvanJan 18, 2007 08:4770562
1Iftikhar Ahmad's shameful letter [164 words]PrashantJun 13, 2022 00:0070562
Most Indian Muslims are from the Dalit caste [94 words]scott in SFDec 26, 2006 01:1470550
1Reply to Scott in SF [202 words]VijayDec 27, 2006 11:5370550
1Muslim Backwardness [82 words]Romesh ChanderDec 25, 2006 21:5470540
1Why is the United States an Exception? [49 words]Jack BergerDec 25, 2006 21:5170539
Muslim migrants [38 words]SalauddeenDec 31, 2006 23:3970539
1Muslims in the US... [31 words]donvanJan 19, 2007 11:3370539
1Their Own Fault [236 words]lindaDec 25, 2006 20:5370534
3what do you expect? [164 words]VijayDec 25, 2006 19:3370528
1Daniel Pipes on Muslim social backwardness, 25.12.2006 [211 words]Ian MordantDec 25, 2006 19:2270525

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)