Who was really ' allah " and to Dhimmi no more- you are right on the point.

Submitted by Ynna (United States), Feb 15, 2007 at 13:32

I watched at You Tube a very interesting commentary by a British Christian father.

He said that allah is an invention. allah was the old god of the moon from one of the tribes that use to live at the time of muhamad and that by being a false god, a pagan god, could have never be considered by serious minds as a real god or even a god.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crNUacUv74I

I say that if allah was a god, he would never need a human being' help, nor a human speaker for him, nor a representative for him.- basic logic

The conclusion above, also belongs , for my dismay, to a former Imam, today evangelist that studied and preached islam until he was 35 years old. He studied in the most respected school for islam, located in Cairo and by 11 years old, already knew the Q'uran by heart- his name:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTBN-Jq8yi8

And, if it is a god, how any muslim ever dares to say it speakes for IT. Do some muslims feel superior to others, as they can speak for allah? Discrimination in between muslims.

For me it is clear that islam is not a religion but a political - social movement, created by a source that today many would consider absolutely deplorable as a human being- that struggled to convince others that islam is a religion, to get some distance and respect from others, while planning and spreading away his heinous words and actions- that's my opinion. In 154 years, the best scholars claim islam originating 83 wars. Other scholars even cite a higher number.

******

And Dhimmi no more, you are absolutely right about Reza Aslan- He is deceiving and summarizes in his lies, and fallacies, an evil that for sure 100 % he is, subject to be uncovered in the RIGHT hour. Besides, CAIR loves him- praising him above everybody as a gold standard- and that's enough to understand WHO Reza Aslan IS.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".