Goodbye

Submitted by Sword of Islam & The Babies of Beslan (United Kingdom), Feb 20, 2007 at 19:09

That is a relief, Moshe as the constant repetition required to stop you from straying off-topic to avoid answering direct questions could only have resulted in a brain haemorrhage on my part.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted by Moshe, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:44

"In fact it is a perfect oxymoron: You just cannot make some hypothetic speculation and call it a "fact"."

- If the British recognition of the Zionist cause & the invasion and conquest of Palestine after 2000 years of Jewish failure to do it for themselves is 'fiction' then you are quite right!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am genuinely sorry that your best line of defence has been the regurgitation of put-downs that I have made to you in previous posts however, I suppose that imitation is the best form of flattery so I shall take it as a compliment.

Glad to see that 'Infidel' is back after his 'absence' to sooth your fevered brow. (What else is he good for, after all?)

However, to give the devil 'his due' you are certainly farther up the food chain than 'Infidel' whose only best argument in defence of the exposure of many, many, historical, geographical, and political faux pas has been a single-minded inability to distinguish statistics provided by the Israeli Bureau of Statistics from Wikipedia which he seems to have an extraordinary obsession with. This extraordinary mistrust of anything on the internet seems odd given the medium through which he advertises his own peculiar brand of ignorance. Especially when some of the information quoted by myself has actually been in the form of paragraphs written by one of the authors whom he cites as an unofficial 'mentor'.

However, his substitution of a reading list in place of an argument, despite its originality, has to rank as the most bare-faced example of intellectual cheek that I have ever encountered! Presumably, he has a list of university qualifications on his c.v. that he can justify as possessing on the basis on owning, and cataloguing the number of pages of books related to the subject matter - despite his inability to recognise the prose of one of these authors when quoted back to him!

The only point that he made which impressed me some time ago turned out to be an example of plagiarism from another author. Copying and pasting somebody else's words without crediting the author is probably as low as a human being can go but in your defence, Moshe, despite your xenophobic, self-delusional, staggerinly blinkered revision of history, at least I cannot accuse of stooping quite that low.

Anyway, back to you Moshe. I am glad that you have 'chosen' to spare me further effort. It is unfortunate that you have a singular inability to answer direct questions that are put to you despite the fact that I have had no compunction in extending you this courtesy. Subject changing as a substitute for clear argument is a kind of intellectual terrorism when applied to debate but you are doubtlessly far better and well practised at it than your Muslim brothers so I shall look upon it as good practise for future skirmishes. If you can't come out in the open and 'slug it out' argumentatively but choose to 'fight dirty' by changing the subject and speaking only in vague, jingoistic terms then you will invariably 'win' every argument that you ever have. Good luck with that strategy. Fascist, though it may be. Glad to see that you've fallen back on that classic label of 'Nazi' though I am encouraged that you haven't managed to squeeze in yet more accusations of Holocaust denial.

However, my vehement anti-Muslim attitutes of the past have been dramatically mellowed by my encounters with you and Infidel. Thank you for motivating me to further investigate this subject and for the realisation that you are just as bad as each other. If a point cannot be shot down by anything other than unspecified, theoretical alternate realities & references to 'eternal rights' (that paradoxically had a 2000 year suspension) then it clearly has some merit.

However, you may want to campaign against the following websites as they are clearly peddling bogus information that is corrupting the perspectives of 'vulnerable' minds like my own. Unfortunately, Infidel will be unable to assist you as his dyslexia will be unable to see anything other than Wikipedia on these links.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/ww1.html

http://www.newdemocracyworld.org/Einstein.htm

http://www.israelipalestinianprocon.org/populationpalestine.html

http://www.myjewishlearning.com/history_community/Modern/Overview_The_Story_19141948/WWI_and_the_Jews/PalestineBTW/MandateI.htm

http://www.myjewishlearning.com/history_community/Modern/Overview_The_Story_19141948/WWI_and_the_Jews/PalestineBTW.htm

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".