69 million page views

"OH NO!" "DON'T SAY IT!" But ... "BRAVO!"

Reader comment on item: My Testimony before the House Subcommittee on Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations

Submitted by Sofa Sogood (United States), Feb 21, 2007 at 16:53

February 21, 2007

Dear Mr. Pipes,

The tape of the February 14th hearing of the Subcommittee was very intense and dramatic to watch.

Although I've read many of your articles and heard you speak before, and although I see the logic of what you're saying, I'm always shocked to hear it. As you began to read your paper, I couldn't help but keep saying, "Oh no! No! You're going too fast! Explain much more -- in detail! Please pull your punches or they'll never listen to or consider a word you're saying!" ... "Winners and Losers!" "Convince them to Give Up!" "Defeat!" Oh, no! Don't say it, no, don't ... oh, you did, "Crush their Will" (which I knew would be heard as "Crush Them!) Then you were done, and it was too late. They were in shock. So was I. I was so disappointed.

But shortly, an amazing thing started to happen. They were so fascinated the sheer audacity of your words -- the sharpness and clarity of your ideas -- and your confidence, that after they regained their composure, and as the hearing went on, it was apparent that they had listened to you -- that they were affected by your ideas, and were actually trying to absorb and consider them.

Bravo to you! I'm glad you didn't listen to me!

Of course, there isn't any way to tell, alas, if your ideas will ultimately be of influence in their decisions. I tend to think not. Not yet. I hope I'm wrong. There's too much investment in the idea of negotiation -- holding on to the irrational belief that rationality and logic will win out. Clearly, it hasn't worked. As you say, the situation is worse now. One of the panel went for the quote, but waffled it -- "The definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing over and over, but expect different results." He was referring to Sharon's "deterrence." But the same thing can be said about "negotiations." What he meant is , "We just have to keep trying different formulas till we get it right." Or will we ever, and what will be lost in the meantime?

(It's very, very hard for ordinary people in Western countries to give up the idea of peace (without resort to war) in the world -- no matter what reality shows us. Unless we've been directly attacked -- and sometimes even then -- we hold on to the belief that all conflicts can be resolved by talk, compromise and reason. It's our dream and hope. We want to believe we've evolved past the stage of killing each other to resolve differences or to gain power. We hold ourselves to higher standards than our ancestors did -- we're better, above that. It's such a cliche, but I'll say it anyway -- we can go into outer space, have the Internet, but are unable to civilize those of us who are not civilized. They are "of us." We are all human and it's ultimately a failure of the human race.)

If deterrence was doing some good in the past, it may work again. But so much has changed. The offspring of Oslo are here and now. It isn't the same world. The opposition is much stronger. Europe has gone totally bonkers and the Media is twisted and warped. It's very "feel good" to side with the underdog, and especially against the despised perceived giants. Racist pre-dispositions have been revived and well-exploited. Mindless emotionality is so cathartic and infectious. Though, on the other hand, after years and years of having been fed disinformation, mangled and revised history, and a constant parade on TV screens of one-sided slaughter and murder, especially of children, by the evil, monster Jews, how much can they be blamed, if at all? The Media has done its damage well. (And Israel has not taken this media campaign seriously enough to overcome it -- or, it seems, has not even attempted to).

Is Israel even capable of "Crushing their Will?" If only. Is it capable of much more than repeatedly defending its borders from the attacks which are sure to increase from all sides against their tiny country? Does Israel have the Will? This generation did not experience pogroms and the holocaust -- it's not the same and they are tired. The "good life" their parents built for them in a free and just nation is at their fingertips, and they want the struggle to be over. It's been 60 years. They don't want to be considered morally reprehensible any longer -- the falsity of this characterization notwithstanding.

Maybe some of the "negotiators" see the endless negotiations themselves as the way to avoid all out war -- and harbor the hope that, placated or not, the Palestinians will eventually tire of all this. They won't. They see victory at hand. They've made great political gains, and with the help of the EU, the US and Israel itself, there's a whole new generation being brought up -- has the world ever seen the likes of this before -- child suicide bombers? Can those poor souls ever approach normality in their lifetimes? They'll be grown up in 10 years, if they live that long.

As I listened to Mr. Indyk, who has hopes for Mr. Abbas, I wondered ...

Suppose Abbas and the PLO are elected next time -- and he has a change of heart -- borders are decided -- Jerusalem decided -- the Palestinian state fully armed as any nation -- and all agreements signed and sealed. How on earth could he ever control Hamas? They will not stop. What could make them stop and change their minds? (And let's not forget Hezbollah).

Then Israel would be back to the military defeat option again -- if it were possible -- "defendable" borders or not.

And if Israel were to win this military option -- they would probably have to kill so many Palestinians one way or another. No matter how much harm the Palestinians do --- and no matter how much they enjoy killing Israelis -- I don't believe Israelis themselves would ever get over the carnage. They can better bear the loss of life of their own than massive loss of life that they have caused to others -- whether the others were at fault or not -- (refer to Lebanon last summer) -- it would become morally ambiguous to them. It would destroy them spiritually -- which would lead to totally. Their status as a pariah nation, if it can be imagined, would become increasingly worse.

(I thought I heard Sharon say (or was it a report of what he said?) that the reason he wanted to unilaterally pull out of Gaza and the West Bank was because (a) Israel no longer had a partner in negotiations as to borders, and (b) the high birth rate of the Palestinians would, in some years cause a much smaller population of Israelis to be virtually ruling over a much higher population of Palestinians, and that this situation would be unsustainable and ultimately harmful to Israel.)

What is the way to go? I keep searching for a sign of light in the universe, but ..... no sign yet.

In my fantasy, Israel finds a beautiful uninhabited island, far away from any continents, slowly dismantles all its laboratories, universities, factories, museums, libraries, archives, takes its art and one stone from the West Wall, ships them there one load at a time -- then gets all it's talented people, and 5 million citizens out, and thumbs its nose at Europe and the Middle East as they say "so long." They'd rebuild and flourish in no time. Maybe they could come back to their country in another 2,000 years when the world might be sane. Might it be by then?

In the faces of the members of the committee, there was a glimmer of recognition -- of truth spoken -- courageous and honest -- a glimpse of something they weren't used to experiencing -- what at first sounded inhumane turned out to be the most humane possible at this time.

Once again, thank you for the inspiration you give so generously, and please, please keep speaking.

Sincerely,

Sofa Sogood

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

I am grateful for your reactions and thoughts. Yes, you are right, my approach amounts to something of a revolution in approaching the Arab-Israeli conflict. I fear that every other approach will have to be tried to the maximum before winning the war will be adopted as a policy goal.

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (79) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Former 'unreliable B'tselem propagandist' steps down from ratings giant Sustainalytics [569 words]Rita VAug 10, 2022 17:18284999
Another Pallywood fake B'tselem Basel Adra: Ma'on Farm [268 words]Diana from CaliforniaApr 15, 2022 12:02279811
Inviting people to use symmetry in reasoning [361 words]PrashantApr 16, 2022 16:39279811
Pallywood: more "Palestinian" cry for cameras only [Dec 2021] [187 words]Diana from CaliforniaApr 18, 2022 03:49279811
Assymetrical Posturing in Irrational Diatribes Rather Than Common Ground of Understanding Do Not Reconcile [76 words]M ToveyApr 18, 2022 18:55279811
"sustained and systematic effort to alter a bellicose mentality" [111 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
David BakinJun 5, 2007 15:0596116
Dr Pipes changing tone.. [112 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
HarrakApr 16, 2007 21:0189431
Thanks Dr Pipes [10 words]HarrakApr 17, 2007 21:2589431
Jaw-dropper [86 words]Mark RothApr 13, 2007 07:5489130
Martin Indyk and Dennis Ross are badly misinformed and a real danger to Israeli Jews [152 words]Kenneth BesigMar 18, 2007 02:4886685
Agree with Kenneth Besig's calibration re: Ross v Indyk; however... [597 words]marianaMar 19, 2007 22:2886685
Is It Time Yet? [367 words]Ron ThompsonMar 17, 2007 19:3986662
Hearings on Israeli-Palestinian "Progress" [23 words]Herb JuristMar 16, 2007 23:1086586
Pipes subcommittee comments [141 words]DeanMar 16, 2007 22:5286583
House subcommittee hearing [45 words]Steven LMar 16, 2007 17:2386543
Will this fairy tale never end? [187 words]DrRJPMar 5, 2007 18:0280412
Middle East Experts [152 words]DavodMar 12, 2007 05:0680412
Mysterious and Unique Logic? [184 words]Dean KitnickFeb 26, 2007 19:5479152
Re your position toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict [68 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Gabriel RinzlerFeb 25, 2007 21:0278889
Let the Arabs rot... [304 words]Linda MooreFeb 26, 2007 12:1778889
"Let the Arabs Rot" by Linda [245 words]Fred SchlomkaFeb 28, 2007 11:1878889
OK, rot or prosper, I don't care which [194 words]Linda MooreFeb 28, 2007 17:4778889
Rot or Prosper continued [172 words]Fred SchlomkaMar 1, 2007 00:0878889
I find it hard to believe you are Israeli - all of your hostility is directed at Israel [310 words]Linda MooreMar 1, 2007 17:4478889
1There are many types of Israelis. We are no more homogenious than people in the USA [283 words]Fred SchlomkaMar 2, 2007 09:3578889
Litmus test is dangerous to Antisemites [66 words]DeMar 2, 2007 17:3378889
Visit this site... [143 words]Linda MooreMar 2, 2007 19:0578889
Of Maps and fatalities [454 words]Fred SchlomkaMar 4, 2007 05:1478889
To: Fred Schlomka, Incredible. "You just can't make it up!" [454 words]marianaMar 19, 2007 20:4178889
To Daniel and Gabriel: on "Winning" [522 words]marianaMar 20, 2007 00:4978889
to Mariana [100 words]ASMar 22, 2007 00:3878889
Fred Schlomka: -Israeli leftist- Is there a difference? [87 words]Mr. ShawarmaMar 27, 2007 23:4678889
Boorish title from Mr. Shawamra [192 words]Fred SchlomkaMar 29, 2007 04:1178889
To Mariana from an israeli [461 words]Fred SchlomkaMar 29, 2007 16:2678889
I applaud those whom you and Jonathan Cook refer to as "thugs" and yes, Jew hater = Ashkenazi Leftist [402 words]Mr.ShawarmaMar 29, 2007 17:0578889
attack by Shawamra [197 words]Fred SchlomkaMar 31, 2007 02:3078889
Fred Schlomka's comments [319 words]Mr. ShawarmaMar 31, 2007 17:3078889
To: Fred Schlomka: on "armchairs and nonsense." [1572 words]marianaApr 1, 2007 12:5078889
some comments for Mariana [878 words]Fred SchlomkaApr 2, 2007 04:3278889
To: AS: This is an ISLAM vs EVERYONE ELSE issue [943 words]marianaApr 2, 2007 11:3878889
To Fred Schlomka: Your "Middle Eastern" Construct is clear. Forgive me if "I pass." [776 words]marianaApr 4, 2007 17:0378889
Fred Schlomka - Hill Top Youth comments verified [40 words]Fred SchlomkaDec 3, 2008 03:4178889
B'TSELEM: Anti Israel liars, unreliable source, propagandists , posing as "human rights activists" [2927 words]FilipSep 1, 2020 11:5778889
Btselem: fake & hypocritical In face of publicized racist Arab attacks inside Israel [77 words]NazariasApr 19, 2021 06:5578889
Fake lying B'Tselem' / Haaretz Basel al-Adara reminds Jussie Smollet [712 words]BassemDec 3, 2021 16:4078889
Exposure of B'tselem's criminal Ezra Bawi and unreliable Haaretz's war on program that exposed him [2865 words]FilipDec 5, 2021 09:1978889
Radical bigot Zehava Galon lack of basic English exposed too [1877 words]FilipOct 18, 2022 19:2378889
WHICH PUBLICATIONS? [21 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mike DavisFeb 25, 2007 20:2878883
War of Wills [455 words]OliverFeb 25, 2007 17:4778869
Negotiation is valuable, even if you believe it won't bring peace [277 words]Erik NelsonFeb 25, 2007 17:2378866
Illumination [297 words]Felipe OrnelasMar 1, 2007 18:4778866
Chamberlain negotiated at Munich... [149 words]DeanMar 16, 2007 23:2478866
Biological [126 words]Don HedemanFeb 25, 2007 17:0978865
ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.. [186 words]DONVANMar 20, 2007 16:0178865
To Donvan: Interesting; would you expand. [152 words]marianaApr 2, 2007 11:5578865
It is not academic.. [174 words]DONVANApr 3, 2007 10:3278865
An unlikely negotiation [289 words]Melvyn RosensteinFeb 25, 2007 15:2978850
re "Arab & Muslim World." [160 words]Jascha KesslerFeb 25, 2007 15:2778849
history and the arab and islamic world [87 words]rodney allsworthFeb 25, 2007 22:3678849
Reaction to Pipes, Indyk, Makovsky Congressional Testimony [187 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Martin KaufmanFeb 25, 2007 10:0878790
The Good Old Gulag Days. [42 words]LeeFeb 25, 2007 09:3578788
Apology for not making it with my big Speed Graphic camera [233 words]Dan SchwartzFeb 25, 2007 08:4378780
Re House Subcommittee on Israeli -Palestinian Nego... [26 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
david levyFeb 25, 2007 06:2078766
consider this... [140 words]JoshuaFeb 22, 2007 00:0578292
RE: Great debate [279 words]Donald Grant CheesmanFeb 25, 2007 18:5778292
"OH NO!" "DON'T SAY IT!" But ... "BRAVO!" [1378 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Sofa SogoodFeb 21, 2007 16:5378222
Peace or Genocide [184 words]Felipe OrnelasFeb 20, 2007 12:1878061
Hate to disagree with you but I do. [105 words]PeterFeb 20, 2007 11:1278054
Hate to disagree with your disagreement, but I do [106 words]Dean KitnickFeb 20, 2007 18:2878054
No dean, you have misunderstood ... [128 words]PeterFeb 21, 2007 23:1178054
No misunderstanding, I just think you're wrong. [86 words]Dean KitnickFeb 22, 2007 20:0878054
I agree with Peter [51 words]Irish SavantFeb 25, 2007 07:1078054
Reality Check [219 words]LarryFeb 25, 2007 09:3878054
Some things are non-negotiable [106 words]ZerubbabelFeb 25, 2007 10:1778054
Actually you needn't wonder. My comments stand on their face. [166 words]PeterFeb 25, 2007 15:3078054
Furthermore [69 words]PeterFeb 25, 2007 15:3678054
The genocide gene evolves [258 words]AronFeb 25, 2007 19:0078054
Why elevate Israel legitimacy to a debate? [59 words]JakeFeb 26, 2007 11:4278054
Subcommittee Investigations [435 words]MichaelMar 3, 2007 12:5578054

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)