Reaction to Pipes, Indyk, Makovsky Congressional Testimony

Submitted by Martin Kaufman (United States), Feb 25, 2007 at 10:08

1. You didn't state the sources of the hostile comments. The mere fact that you 3 witnesses [and the committee] got hostile comments would not be remarkable at all if they are from known anti-Zionist [anti-Israel -- I'm not sure if the 2 are really equivalent] or pro-Arab sources. It would be significant if the hostile comments were from the "mainstream" press [even in the "mainstream" press, some commentators have been anti-Israel for a long, long time [e.g. Robert Novack, Armand de Borchgrave] or tohers that have long been anti-Israel or anti-Semitic.

2. I certainly agree that there has been a very noticeable increase in anti-Israel sentiment among sectors that have not traditionally been anti-Zionist/anti-Israel or anti-Semitic is especially alarming, and the degree to which it has become common on college campuses [especially among faculty and administrators] , as is the apparent alliance between "left-wing" groups [which used to be disproportionately Jewish in the U.S.] and "pro-Palestinian" and anti-Israel groups. I put "pro-Palestinian" in quotes because I don't think the thug-ocracy that has "represented" the Palestinians [whether PLO, Fatah or Hamas] has actually benefitted the Palestinian people.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".