Michel, you're overlooking a vital point

Submitted by Noah Wilk (United States), Feb 28, 2007 at 21:44

Michel wrote:

"Lastly - if you - and i repeat myself here once again - saw and experienced up close and personal, what a "surgical strike", a car bomb, a suicide bomb leaves in terms of carnage, misery and horror, you would less likely call for "nuking any country or carpet bombing them back to the stone age. That's what I called "video game approach"."

Michel, it's blatantly obvious that you are addressing me when you talk about this. What you utterly fail to understand is that I have seen combat. Combat of the worst kind. I have had to fight my way out of an area using nothing more than my combat knife. I have been in many kill-or-be-killed hand-to-hand combats. I have seen arms and legs blown off, eyes blown out of heads, entrails spilled on my shoes. I have seen the effects of napalm and other horrendous weapons of war. In some cases I was the witness to such horrible effects, in others I was the agent delivering such wrath and destruction. I have seen the horrors of war up close and in person. Were I a lesser man, I would no doubt be whining and surrendering to the enemy the way you are, due to being emasculated. Thankfully, I have retained both my masculinity and my fighting spirit.

So it is not a "video game approach". And having seen these horrors in person has not made me any less eager to deport Muslims and to isolate them with the threat of nuclear annihilation. Why? Because I have seen what Muslims do. I have seen the atrocities they commit. And while I (thankfully) have never been in an Iranian, Saudi, or other Muslim prison, I have seen what happens in those places, and how innocent people are tortured, often to death, in the name of Islam. I have seen videos of women being brutally stoned to death for the "crime" of having been raped by a Muslim savage who cannot control his sexual desire. I have seen the sexual mutilation they inflict on their women (and male prisoners as well!).

The bottom line is...better them than us. I am not the one looking for war. I prefer peace. I am not the one who declared war on Islam. Islam declared war on me. Better to nuke a city full of Muslims who support, plot and participate in terrorist activities than to allow them to nuke New York city, a city full of innocent people who allow Muslims in this country to live freely and happily. All the Muslims need to do to avoid nuclear holocaust is literally nothing. They need to do nothing and nothing in return will happen to them. How much easier can it get? Just don't do anything, and nothing will happen! With my plan, they would have to literally choose to be annihilated and purposefully and with full intent choose to go down that path by plotting and committing a mass terror attack on America.

But you're not interested in honesty, now are you? You're a clown, a clown who cannot deal with the harsh realities of life, or common sense, or honesty. You're doing nothing more than trying your best to avoid dealing with reality. Your main purpose for being here is to insult Susan and to ignore me while accusing both of us of being Nazis, all because you refuse to deal with reality. You believe there are 30 million Muslims in America, that all of them are friendly, reform-minded patriots, and that Santa and the Easter Bunny exist. Maybe the Tooth Faerie too. Your focus is not on doing something to counter the growing threat of Islam. You don't even discuss that anymore. All you do is try to vilify people like me, Susan, and Dhimmi No More, because you're simply not man enough to honestly and openly debate these things with us. You prefer drama queen exists and magical reappearances filled with insults. You misrepresent and misquote the rest of us, you make false accusations and twist satements, all because you can't handle reality.

It's a shame. I really did expect more from you.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".