69 million page views

what more evidence do we need..

Reader comment on item: An Unveiling: Separate, but Acceptable?
in response to reader comment: Are u kidding?

Submitted by donvan (United States), Mar 28, 2007 at 09:44

Should any additional evidence be required to attest to the aggressive and dominating nature of Islam, one need look no closer than this response. The concept is called "Inalienable" rights. This means that we, as Americans cannot be separated from our Right of freedom of speech. You may not tell me what I may or may not say, regarding any subject,anytime any where.

Obviously these concepts are unfamiliar to you, and one can understand ignorance. In America the rights of the individual to speak his mind also applies to you. You have the right to defend what you believe, you have no rights as a "Muslim". You have no right not to be offended, and yes the Muhammedian dogma of spreading his message with the sword is offensive to the human community. The so called "Dome of the rock" decalres "God has no Son" very insulting and offensive to Christians.

To the non Muhammedian, Islam is a dark,dangerous,and deadly, bent on destruction slavery and violence. One need only to look at the pathetic condition Muhammed has led the people to, drowning in their own excrement, and yet you would have me be silent. That is not will of God, that is the will of man. Human beings that believe they speak for God, yet deceive and take their money to destroy the infidels from the people. Al Lah may give you many things. Gold,riches,slaves,many wives,power and people may fear you. But he cannot give you peace. It is thru Jesus Christ the God transformed mankind and introduced the possibility Peace. Put away your sword Muhammed.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (41) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
oddly powerful anonymity [73 words]nicoletteDec 26, 2006 10:1370590
1Well done - Dutch [16 words]VijayNov 18, 2006 11:2366500
Modesty or nudity [47 words]TruthJul 11, 2008 05:0666500
1Awful truth [92 words]BronsonMay 15, 2009 03:2266500
More Muslim Women against the Burqa [167 words]zzazzeefrazzeeNov 16, 2006 00:1666279
1truth is... [231 words]donvanNov 22, 2006 08:1566279
Donovan- I think we're on the same page here. [456 words]zzazzeefrazzeeNov 24, 2006 22:1266279
1POINT OF CONTENTION.. [108 words]DONVANNov 27, 2006 09:0866279
Shall we ban nuns from wearing habits then? [89 words]zzazzeefrazzeeNov 28, 2006 19:1066279
1the difference.... [176 words]DONVANNov 30, 2006 15:4466279
hijab is not a political statement [835 words]zzazzeefrazzeeDec 12, 2006 15:0066279
VERY GOOD POST... [147 words]DONVANDec 12, 2006 16:4666279
Dear Donvan part two! [173 words]SpotterDec 23, 2006 04:5666279
Hijab [88 words]donvanDec 25, 2006 07:0766279
1Nawal El Saadawi [79 words]Krista K.Dec 31, 2006 23:0266279
Should the nikab be banned? [87 words]Krista KDec 31, 2006 23:3266279
1YES, IT IS .. [161 words]DONVANAug 3, 2007 16:4166279
1Thank you.. [71 words]donvanAug 3, 2007 16:5366279
2Show us your face, please! [114 words]Octavio JohansonNov 15, 2006 11:0066192
1burqua wars... [67 words]donvanNov 14, 2006 14:0966089
Muslim Women against the Niqab and Burqa [171 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
zzazzeefrazzeeNov 15, 2006 23:5466089
1About time [78 words]sur kaiNov 24, 2006 20:5366089
the habit & the hijab [162 words]donvanNov 28, 2006 09:5366089
Dear Donvan [186 words]SpotterDec 23, 2006 04:3366089
1regarding the "Hijab" [95 words]donvanDec 25, 2006 06:5266089
Reply to Donvan [385 words]SpotterDec 26, 2006 01:3966089
1a little tolerance... [201 words]donvanDec 27, 2006 08:3366089
what? [146 words]eh..Feb 1, 2007 21:3766089
1I love Muslims..... [181 words]donvanFeb 5, 2007 09:5166089
Right... [154 words]ehFeb 17, 2007 20:4866089
2nice try... [147 words]donvanFeb 26, 2007 10:1266089
Are u kidding? [139 words]ehMar 26, 2007 17:0966089
1what more evidence do we need.. [265 words]donvanMar 28, 2007 09:4466089
what? [129 words]ehMar 29, 2007 17:1666089
1what is your point... [91 words]donvanApr 2, 2007 11:3866089
Donvan is confused... [78 words]eh...Apr 8, 2007 14:5966089
1Thanks for the response [161 words]donvanApr 9, 2007 10:3766089
1eh,huh and wah? [130 words]joe kaffirApr 9, 2007 11:5066089
1eh.... you are in denial! [101 words]JaladhiApr 9, 2007 16:2166089
2Our dear eh and Islam is the religion of peace? You must be kidding! [72 words]dhimmi no moreApr 10, 2007 07:0366089
2For our dear eh and and speaking of disrespect [425 words]dhimmi no moreApr 10, 2007 07:2866089

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)