Islamo-Facism Was a Concern During World War II---Plans Made to End Islamic Threat, Forever.

Submitted by William Bryan (United States), Jul 5, 2007 at 18:20

With the promise of German help to free Islam from the yoke of Colonial Britain and France---and exterminate Jews---, the nations of Islam supplied over a hundred thousand troops to the NAZI cause. While most of these Islamic troops did not do too well in combat, they did tie down many Allied Divisions.

Shortly after V-J Day, the end of WWII, Truman had a TOP SECRET brain trust investigate future threats to the US and its freedom loving allies for the next 100 years. (Acessible at Truman Library in Independence, Missouri)

Threat #1: An Islam-Facism empowered by US Petro Dollars.

Threat #2: Communism as a philosophical Trojan Horse for Russian Imperialism.

Threat #3: Oil running out by YR 2050 plus or minus 10 years.

Many other threats were studied; but, these were part of the top 10 threats to World Peace.

Plans were made to make the US totally energy by YR2000 so as to greatly defuse the power

of Islam; and, hopefully to moderate and isolate Islam and cause Islam to finally 'wither on the vine.'

Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson continued this policy and predictions were made

in 1969 that total US energy independence would be achieved a few years before YR 2000!

Unfortunately for World Peace, President Nixon and his vile adviser, Henry Kissinger, decided tomanipulate the price of oil and attack the peaceful uses nuclear energy and thwart the 'Truman-Eisenhower Total Energy Indpendence Program.'

Since Nixon, only President Reagan tried to reinvigorate a US policy to become totally energy independent. Most Democrats and some Republicans opposed this---to our detriment.

I was hoping that George Bush '43 would be shaken into positive action after 9-11; but,

most of his actions empower the forces of Islamo-Facism and enfeeble the US.

What are our US leaders drinking in Washington, DC, that could cause most of them to

oppose freedom and independence?

Sincerely!

Bill Bryan

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".