So Many "Chilling" Misconceptions

Submitted by orange yonason (United States), Jul 29, 2007 at 16:17

B"H

(A) " . . . I can also dig up a thousand photos of dead Iraqis and Palestinians killed by Jews and Christians" -- ChrisG

No, he can't.

The so-called "palestinians" don't count, not just because they don't exist, but because their dead were either terrorists or people who were too close to terrorists or people they themselves killed and blamed on Jews or people who weren't killed but pretended to be. None were killed in cold blood by Jews, who were fighting in self defense: unlike the case of all the dead Jews who were deliberately murdered by the palace indians. (get some facts) As to Iraqis, the same is true of the "killing", only replace the terms "palestinian" with "Iraqi, and "Jew" with "American."

(B) "Lumping all Muslims together is simplistic black and white" -- ChrisG

Lumping Jews and Americans together with Jihadi madmen is deliberate objuscation of the facts in order to justify the evil the savage Islamofascists commit. Any time anyone does that, I know right away they are not on my side.

Now, as to "lumping all Muslims together," that's not what we are doing, and just because ChrisG is right that it isn't ALL Muslims who are evil doesn't mean that the problem doesn't exist in Islam a whole lot more than it does in any other religion or national group. For example. . .

. . . if we look at it from a statistical perspective we discover . . .

a- The likelyhood that a suicide bomber will br Christian or Jewish or Hindu or Budhist (etc.,) is essentially 0%. Same for slitting someone's throat for their god on the evening news.
b- The likelyhood that someone who commits those perversions will be a Muslims is 100%.
c- That means that the problem lies not with any other group, but solely with Islam and/or Muslims.
THERE IS NO OTHER LOGICAL CONCLUSION
And, that means they are the ones who are obligated to fix the problem. But they aren't even trying, and until they do, we have every right to hold them accountable. Well, their leadership, at the very least.

They need to stop lashing out at everyone else, stand up and take responsibility for their mess and clean it up. Then there won't be any problem with people thinking, "Sure I know most Muslems aren't going to harm me, but I wonder if THIS Moslem can be trusted not to blow my brains out when I turn my back on him?" That isn't an unreasonable fear given the statistics, and given the hate that is being preached to Muslims in the Wahhabi controled Mosques (nearly all of them).

(C) And, since some still think Islam is sooooo much more tolerant than we are, I can't resist this wonderful illustration.

Just think about it. How many countries are there that would "tolerate" a man leading a woman in bondage along a public thoroughfare while lecturing her from some "holy" book? And notice the blank catatonic look of terror in her face. Looks to me like she's afraid that he might just pull out a toenail or two (or worse?) to make his point. (Don't forget the pooper scooper, Razule. She won't be really humiliated until she is forced to make in public.)

We accuse Islam of intolerance, hate and violence, we provide proof.

They accuse us, . . . and accuse us, . . . and accuse us . . . but never any proof, just a few silly cartoons and a whole lot of propaganda over a few dead terrorists who we killed in self defense ,or Arabs who were the unfortunate collateral damage resulting from THEIR perfidy, and because we "dared" to defend ourselves against them.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".