about OIC and lazy money

Submitted by G.Vishvas (India), Mar 17, 2008 at 00:11

In the capitalist system a huge number of people get money without working for it, or doing any really honest hard work for it.

So too the muslims got petro-dollars aplenty.

Muslims neither invented nor discovered petroleum nor did they make it valuable or useful. But they blackmailed mankind and got huge lot of money for it. Once petroleum was too cheap leading to excesses of use, and now the world is addicted to it and the muslims can blackmail the world more than ever before.

10 000 billion dollars have gone to the muslims as a result of this idle blackmail and the agents and quislings of islamic imperialism are making use of it for spreading islamic fascism and totalitarianism all over the world.

The OIC is a carcinome growing out of this past.

Everything good (money, technology, knowledge, geo-political support, even humanitarian aid etc.) that non-muslims gave or give to muslims will end up in the hands of the islamo-fascists and strengthen them. What do the muslims have to show for the money that they got for no work? An increase in islamic fascism, violence, victimhood (mostly of their own violence) and arrogance is all that they have to show forth.

It would have had been better for mankind if USA had not been so rabidly dollar-hungry, petroleum-thirsty and blindly anti-communist for 50 long years and had co-operated with the communists to get rid of islam and not collaborated with the agents and quislings of islam in order to get rid of communists, who, for all their faults, were more humanistic and hence did bring forth a Gorbachov.

Everything islamic will lead to fascism and arab imperialism and arab ethno-fascism.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".