More fantasy from the wannabe Arab taj and his people

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 13, 2008 at 19:45

Our dear Taj wrote

>>What logic?

>My point exactly...lol

And your point is?

>Oh, and the same evidence that you use to conclude Muhammad as a warlord is the same evidence for the existence of Islam in the time of the Prophet (a "duh" is appropriate here)

So you agree with me that Muhammad was an arabian warlord and caravan raider? Right?

>I am very sorry that you still assume that to be Muslim requires that you read, speak, or write Arabic - this of course is not true, nor in the face of the majority of over a billion Muslims not being Arab is it very rational (or intelligent) to assume such...

Well this is what the Qur'an says a book that you cannor read in arabic becuase you ain't no Arab

>It is hilarious that you continue to idiotically presume what I know/don't know about arabic when you haven't the foggiest of even who I am, what I've studied, or even what I look like...you are truly amusing

Dream on

>As for the quranic phrase you poorly transliterate - it is a good indicator that you are not much of an arabic speaker (any novice can transliterate arabic) - for instance you wrote "qawmuhu" but the Quran says "qawmihi". Qawmuhu is would not be poper grammar...

Really? his people means qawmuhu but again your Allah makes mistakes in his Arabic as in the case of ina hadhan la sahiran

>By the way, with regard to the verse, you left off, liyubayyina lahum fayudillu, now you know the reason why that was...lol

ROTFL Pakistani Arabic it is liyubayina lahum fayudillu allah man yyusha' wa yahdi man yyasha' blah.. blah blah..

Do you know what this means? It means that your Allah is really evil and it means that islam is the religion of the arabs and you ain't no Arab

And oh is it maaliki or is it maliki? and you are no more than a demagogue

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".