The Koran is irrelevant

Submitted by Hannibal (Australia), Nov 6, 2010 at 20:10

If your argument rests on the unquestionable tuth of the Koran then I think you are sadly mistaken. The Koran is a book and apparently contains the revelations of God (or Allah). I do not think God - if there is one - would select a paedophile as his spokesperson. Consequently, the Book of the Paedophile contains a rehash of other 'holy' texts like the Bible and Torah mixed with visions of the world as announced by a paedophile, a sexually inadequate man. For example, in the Koran there are the Medina revelations and then there are the Meccas revelations that conflict and reveal expediency rather than 'divine' insight. That expediency is more suited to the character of a paedophile than one with any 'divine' inclination.

Search your mind and heart and you will find that truth, too,

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".