Our dear Ayatt and his bogus claim

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Apr 21, 2007 at 18:06

Our dear Ayatt rabina yu3alimuka al-haqiqa, oh you do not know Arabic, oh well.

You wrote that the Qur'an has not changed blah...blah...blah

But how do you explain that in the Cairo edition (1923-1924) of the Qur'an the rasm of the word MKL in Surat al-fatiha ir read as: Maaliki or the owner of and in the 1969 Tunisian edition of the Qur'an it is read as: Maliki or the king of? Oh I forgot and the 3Ulama had to edit the rasm of the word MLK by adding in the first case an alif after the letter meem, a kasra under the letter lam, and a kasra under the letter kaf, and in the second case they added a fatha above the meem and a kasra under both lam and kaf? It is either Muhammad heard it as Maaliki or as Maliki it could not have been both! What do you think ya ayuha al-fahlawi al-kabeer? So much for the unedited Qur'an!

Your claim is bogus.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".