|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
things are very rarely as they seemReader comment on item: Has Islam been Hijacked by Radicals? Submitted by the Grand Infidel of Kaffiristan (Australia), Jan 15, 2011 at 20:49 DNM writes: "Oh the new Mullah I mean Sheikh? His name is Abdallah Adhami who tells us in his web site Sakinat (A Quranic word which is a loan word from Hebrew and is not an Arabic word and what a scandal) that he Abdallah is a decendant of a certain Arabian warlord and caravan raider! Mash'allah" It's common for nobodies to make all sorts of claims - but in this case has it been proven beyond all doubt that Mo really had any descendants in the first place? That he was not cuckolded by Khadija who could have sort solace elsewhere? After all she would have been well aware of his often brutal treatment of women - and it is not beyond the bounds of possibility that he in fact had no descendants at all. Of course this is conjecture but no less fanciful than the bulk of Islamic 'scriptures' - some of which show evidence that all was not as modern-day muslims would like to have the world believe when it came to Mo's supposed sexual prowess. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (59) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |