Re: the so-called Palestinians

Submitted by DEBORAH THE JUDGE (United States), Jun 7, 2012 at 10:34

Martin, I have exhausted the biblical prophetic identification of these modern-day warriors of hate throughout this site for some time now with absolutely no dialogue. I greatly appreciate the academic thoroughness and insightfulness of Dr. Pipes and consider him unmatched for this type of forum on the internet. The contributors to his articles and blogs are engaging, well-read, and offer excellent counterpoints to consider. For the most part, political and academic assessments are the rule.

However, in order to prevail , you must identify your enemy and his nature and know how to fight him. One wouldn't use a mousetrap to catch an anaconda. The same goes for the ongoing battles in the Mideast and the West's ignorance of the ancient mindset of these peoples. I disagree with Dr. Pipes regarding the ultimate objective of the UN and these Palestinian pawns. This war is about the Jewish people, the land of Israel, and specifically Jerusalem The weak methods of western European diplomacy will never work with these people. Why? Because they are Edomites and Ishmaelites. They thrive on infighting and conquest and war. Notice that for the most part, they cannot make a desert bloom, and once they occupy an established oasis (i.e. Gaza) they trample it and turn it into a ghetto and war zone. Once they occupy western Europe with it's cobbled streets and high architecture and freedoms they burn cars, throw rocks, and pollute the system with Shariah bullying. "A wild ass of a man. His hand against every man and every man's hand against him" belongs to the Ishmaelites. "By your sword shall you live. Away from the dew of the earth" belongs to the Edomites.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".