|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obama, the optimal outwitterReader comment on item: The One-Minute Guide to Obama's Foreign Policy Submitted by Tabitha Korol (United States), Oct 18, 2015 at 21:21 In other words, Obama's policy is purposeful but the consequences are not. (October 13, 2015) Yes. his policies are purposeful, but what would he have preferred as consequences if he had a do-over? Don't you think he's pleased that he's destroyed our educational system? that he's turned our kids into Socialists, perhaps Marxists? that he's prevented the pipeline from making us energy independent? that he's turned Israel into a pariah nation to most of the world? that he's bringing terrorists who rape and kill into our country to destroy the US in the same way they're destroying Sweden, Germany, France, England? that he's allowed 2,300 or so mosques to grow in this country, which can only lead to the proliferation of Muslims in the areas? What am I missing? What do you think he's not yet accomplished that he won't within the next year? He is destroying nations and turning the world into an Islamic caliphate. He must be very pleased with himself...enough to take vacations and go golfing, knowing that the world is falling around us. Tabitha (t-BEE'-thuh) Korol
Dislike
Submitting....
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Daniel Pipes replies: As the title implies, I limited myself to foreign policy. Reader comments (35) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |