Godspeed, Donald Trump!

Submitted by Michael S (United States), Dec 12, 2015 at 07:36

Thank you for your editing, Daniel & staff. My version was considerably more hot under the collar.

Regarding Mr. Trump and his campaign, it is obvious (painfully so, for the Leftists) that "The Donald" has been leading in the polls in the race for the Republican nomination, despite some to fhe dirtiest tactics the MSM, Obama, the Democrats, the Establishment Republicans and the Bankers and Multinationals have been able to use against him. Second place to Trump has been held first by Ben Carson and now by Ted Cruz, both of them anti-Establishment candidates.

In spite of Trump's popularity among actial VOTERS, as in "Americans", the betting odds have consistently placed him behind Bush and Rubio, who have been languishing in the polls and stand to lose both Iowa and New Hampshire. That is because first Bush, and now Rubio (and on the Democrat side, Clinton) are backed by, literally, some of the most wealthy people and multinational corporations in the world. They are, speaking plainly, "bought and paid for", or, to put it another way, "in the pocket" of the "1% of the 1% of the 1%".

The MSM is, of course, in the same pockets with them; and if one reads the names of the sponsors of the Public Broadcasting System, one sees the names of the same foundations of the super-super-super rich that are sponsors of Clinton, Rubio and Bush.

It is not surprizing, then, that this oligarchy has been trying to portray Donald Trump as a bigot, a clown and, judging by feedback I've gotten from Leftist neighbors, a new Hitler. He is none of these; in fact, he's the most honest and probably the most sensible candidate in the race. That is why my original version of my post was considerably hotter than the edited version shown.

Godspeed, Donald Trump!

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".