It's about putting conditions upon entry and residence in(to) democratic nations

Submitted by Demsci (Netherlands), Dec 21, 2015 at 12:57

Hi, Uncle Vladdi.

I acknowledge what you say.

And precisely because of that I juxtapose our democratic ideology against their Islamic ideology. Many of us should train themselves as a habit in our own ideology. And demand that Immigrants and citizens are required to commit to certain democratic rules, values, tenets, behavior. And loyalty to our system and yes nations. Like Ken Gunn advocates in his comment above. Muslims are therewith on probation, even lifelong maybe.

I know my suggestion seems highly improbable, due to resistance from Political Corrects. And because of deceit and dissembling from Muslims.

Nevertheless it's implementation gives tools to governments + committed pro-democrats, tools not now available. Finally distinction on ground of ideology becomes possible. Tepid Muslims could adapt, because of other interests like livelyhood, career, children, illness, and they might find so-called theological loopholes, with some vague interpretations of QHS, from obscure verses.

This is only our beginning, not a complete strategy, which should be long-term one and based on training ourselves on getting to know Democracy very very well, formulating it very very clearly and upgrading it as much as we can. In contrast to the vague, immutable QHS.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".