Islam is a monopolist ideology, for sheep, isn't it?

Submitted by Demsci (Netherlands), Dec 31, 2015 at 03:32

Hi Uncle Vladdi,

You're a gift that keeps on giving. Thanx! You described Islam to minute detail + in essence. You asserted Islam was clear in what it aims and is FOR.

Now Sun Tzu said that we should know well both our enemies AND ourselves, who are FOR what we want + I might add the multitudes of neutrals. With many an Islamic conquest large numbers of people remained neutral, didn't they? With catastrophic Islamic success as a consequence.

It struck me that you sort of described Islam as striving for MONOPOLY. With many sheepish followers AND dhimmi's. So ... what ARE WE, in essence? Simply put; Are we neutrals, materialists, anarchists even, who only know what we DO NOT WANT? Only in the resistance-business?

Are we Democratic Citizens, not, say, Autonomists (for the individual)?! And this is the age of Big Data! We can do the following: Beat Islam soundly when it comes to CLEARLY formulating + upgrading our MIG-texts (Most Important Guiding) (upgrading which Muslims cannot do with their MIG-texts; QHS). And then we can measure, analyse + promote with Big Data Analytics, only now getting mainstream, the autonomy we have now + want to defend + promote.

And this is what WE autonomists-democratic citizens are FOR. We like to grow ever more, but WE are not like the "neutrals" among us, who almost are suicidal with their freedoms + seemingly not afraid of anarchy or dictatorship (from Muslims or other monopolists).

And this means we can presume ever more asking the Muslims to tell us if they are in favor of the monopolist Muslims or for us Autonomists? And neutral Muslims are still too much in the Ummah + at least for us that is reason not to trust them. We also put autonomist, democratic, controllable conditions on Autonomist Muslims.

It is my hope that many Democratic Citizens are fiercely Autonomists! And we CAN measure + promote that now! Sorry if I sound Science Fiction, but it gives me hope.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".