It isn't due to vehement anti-Hillary sentiments

Submitted by Anon. (Israel), Apr 10, 2016 at 14:09

The results would have been identical had the option been for "any Democrat", rather than explicitly to Hillary.

In addition, Trump just might reverse some of the disastrous pro-Islam (and anti-Westernism, anti-Israel) tide of political correctness.
If this tide isn't reversed (or at least stopped) than no elections would help in the long run.

It's also terribly important to stop mass-Muslim immigration, which is also unfettered Muslim immigration, which is a bigger threat to the West than anything else, certainly a bigger threat than 'global warming'. Again, Trump would be the most likely to do this.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".