"Death to Iran"

Submitted by Robert (United States), Dec 8, 2016 at 11:41

Perhaps, under Trump as President, we may see the Ayatollah
finally getting of expletives returned in kind.

Not only is Iran tooting its anti-Americanism since 1979,
when it held American diplomats hostages for 444 days
under the administration of our "Apartheid" President Carter,
but it subscribes to Death to Israel as its official foreign policy directive.
Sunni Saudi Arabia, long ago, recognized that Mecca and Medina are sufficient for Islam,
while Revolutionary Shia Iran under its Ayatollahs have their cravings set on Jerusalem.
This should remind us of Revolutionary National Socialist Germany under "Austrian" Chancellor Hitler.

The destruction of the Iranian Theocratic Regime should be the strategic goal of the United States and Europe. Significantly, Obama did not include the non-Nuclear issues with Iran
in the deal he made. So instead of opposing that deal,
the Trump administration should explicitly target Iran for its expansionist Shia Revolution,
and more particularly demand of it that it should seize its anti-America and anti-Israel agitation
with its depiction of the two, respectively, as the Big Stan and the Little Satan.

In brief, just because Obama negotiated that Nuclear Deal with Iran,
should not interfere with a strategic aim at toppling the Theocratic Iranian Regime
which seeks to impose the dominance Shia upon the Islamic world,
and the destruction of Israel by violence as a Jewish state
to be replaced by a Muslim one.
Not coincidentally Israel emerged in 1948,
while Ayatollah Iran popped into existence in 1979.
We should give preference to the older entity
for temporal priority at least.
As far as I know, Iran is the only Theocracy in the World.
Surprisingly, the International Community of Nations
doesn't challenge the Ayatollah
as to his "Digital Device" link to God (how else?).

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".