|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
DNM - What is Evidence That Arabs, Not Persian/Asian Influences Referenced Sinim/ChinaReader comment on item: Islam's Surprising Impact on Daily Life Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Dec 15, 2021 at 17:44 DNM-In previous references of yours in determining which Hadith(s) have been influenced in earlier or later invasive absorption of appropriating and replacing indigenous practices of cultural ideologies and scientific advances of prior societies, is there evidence that those cultures were not Arabic in their nature, that non-Arabic (say predecessors to Afghani and Turkic, Persian and other central Asian cultures, even nomadic Mongolian) knew of the societies of the far east as was the Torah and the Tanakh in its prophetic references to Sinnim? How are such issues of confusion resolved? Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (28) on this item |
Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |