|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
you didn't understand !!Reader comment on item: Keeping Muslim Girls under Wraps in France Submitted by Fraz (United States), Jan 9, 2006 at 19:56 Dear beg, you neither did understand my point nor Daniel pipes.I replied to your following unjustified a bunch of opinions.. "There are millions of uneducated superstitious Muslims in South Asia, for instance, who do a lot of things that are not even within Islam but they do it because of influences of Hinduism" you would have given e.g without pointing others for wrong doing (not like anything good goes to Islam and bad things for others) . As far as Mr. Pipes article is concerned it has more profound meaning. try to understand it before shouting. The person who locked up 4 girls is living in the western society (among free thinkers, where you can practice your own religion unlike Saudi Arabia) and he was an immigrant once. In order to live peacefully there he can't isolate himself/his ideas. He has to mixup with the surroundings (just natural law). Because he is there by choice of his own and no body forced him to live in the free society. Once he is there he is abide by local rule & laws. Since local law doesn't want to promote religious practices in public such as veiling ( obiviously it will try to distinguish people from diff. sects) & since this guy couldn't protest the law directly, he went against it indirectly by not allowing his children to go to school. But he also locked them in the apartment , it's a crime on the face of humanity. We wanted to teach them only Koran. What's going on here in his mind ? Don't you see any problem with this guy living in the western society who is apposing to mix up with them, defying to follow their rule ? Isn't there a potential threat to western society ? Don't you see any correlation based upon his behaviour ? Well to you this may not seem be a threat but certainly it is for them where this kind of people are living (all over the world)..keeping themselves isolated. Now you may associate the western culture for their alienation rather than their reluctance to mixing up with them/ respect their culture ? And this is where my replies come into picture "DON'T BLAME OTHERS, Introspect yourselves, find out the problems and solve them by yourselves". By the way your other e.g of teenager boy voilating traffic signal is absurd & irrelevant here. This tactics also didn't work (for which I had told to come with other tactics). Anyway articles like this will keep coming . You will keep denying them or by pointing others you will keep justifying them/your religion and no end to that. My point is understand the root cause and prevent it's ramification. Otherwise there is no end to this endless debate. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (23) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |