69 million page views

to taimur---dont justify unjustifible

Reader comment on item: Keeping Muslim Girls under Wraps in France
in response to reader comment: To prove the case, throw in the whole thing

Submitted by aumprakash reddy (United States), Jan 11, 2006 at 17:57

I like to start my reply with your own comments

"My humble suggestions: courses in critical reading, history, and most importantly, logic would help. Leave fear and hatred aside -- and please understand the whole thing fully before commenting."

How do you follow your own suggestion

Sati was prevalent in INDIA(HINDUSTAN) in medeival times, its been dead for almost two centuries now. I dont know why your'e raking up this non -issue to justify the status of women(now-not in medieval times) in ISLAM.

HInduism had great reforms like rajaram mohanroy, swami dayan and saraswati in 19th century who fought against the evils in hindu religion.I am proud to say my reiligion is progressive religion changing with times. The scholars( not everybody is bramhan...only the educated and enlightened soul is) you quote in your reply to me belong to medieval times...not some mullahs issueing fatwahs against everbody and everything now a days.

So, take it easy dont try to justify the something not justifiable using history of another religion, if you can try to change or bring change in your faith.


Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (23) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Does it make sense? [84 words]HAAug 19, 2007 12:47106521
1Unbelievable [137 words]Ishan AlmaziAug 11, 2007 18:57105931
1Protection for women [149 words]OswaldAug 18, 2007 10:17105931
Human values ?? [52 words]tom nortonJan 9, 2006 14:2731350
Be courteous to your Creator [83 words]HishamApr 11, 2006 13:0431350
To prove the case, throw in the whole thing [69 words]Taimur BegJan 9, 2006 07:3731328
Stop Pointing others !! [122 words]FrazJan 9, 2006 15:4231328
Read carefully first, then comment [123 words]Taimur BegJan 9, 2006 16:1631328
Reply to Taimur Beg [111 words]Tom NortonJan 9, 2006 16:5031328
You are missing the point Taimur [123 words]John GiannascaJan 9, 2006 17:1331328
you didn't understand !! [455 words]FrazJan 9, 2006 19:5631328
Re: Taimur Beg's misconception [131 words]KafirJan 9, 2006 20:5531328
U got it all wrong Mr.Taimur [186 words]Aumprakash reddyJan 9, 2006 21:4231328
1An example of the problem before us [439 words]Taimur BegJan 9, 2006 22:2831328
bad logic as usual [130 words]TaimurJan 10, 2006 10:1531328
as usual blame others for your problems...typical [239 words]Aumprakash reddyJan 10, 2006 17:0331328
To: reddy [207 words]TaimurJan 11, 2006 11:2031328
to taimur---dont justify unjustifible [179 words]aumprakash reddyJan 11, 2006 17:5731328
Clarification [310 words]TaimurJan 12, 2006 02:0531328
Taimur Bug grow up now !! [231 words]tomJan 12, 2006 14:3231328
u dont get it do you [320 words]Aumprakash ReddyJan 12, 2006 18:1831328
A small minority doing something absurd you say,Mr. Beg? [492 words]Little HammerJan 6, 2008 14:1131328
why not sending him back to Arabia? [210 words]bruno, ITJan 9, 2006 03:1731316

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)