For Azmat Zuberi (Rabina Yu3azim Alihu) Sibli Zaman is your reference? You are kidding me

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 16, 2006 at 19:43

My dear Azamat (RYA) Since when is Sibli Zaman whoever he is a dictionary or a book of grammar? Let me help you, he ain't.

Did you ever hear of something called primary sources? And do you know what is a primary source and how to examine primary sources in their primary lanagues? Did you also hear of something called: stay in focus?

Let me help you:

1. Your Arabic grammar is defective.

2. Your Arabic vocalization is poor.

3. Your transliteration is just as poor.

4. You pretend to know arabic so why dont you go and examine what Ibn Manzur is saying in his Lisan al-3Arab and come back and tell us. You know why you depend on Zaman? Because you know no Arabic.

4. You are not very focused.

Then you are debating a language that you do not understand and then you have the audacity to tell me that you have been studying Arabic for 4 or is it 5 years? And then you pretend to be an Iranain! Shame.

Now back into focus: You prove to us that the word Islam and salam have anything in common from the grammar point of view! Tendentious web sites including Mr Zaman will not be considered as evidence. Grammar books written in arabic will be considered as evidence.

It is just shocking to see you my dear Azamt (RYA) trying to spread the religion that brutalized your ancestors. Shame.

Let me tell you that i told you early on thet you are either:

1. A pakistani who pretends to know Arabic.

2. Or you are an Arab that fluked his Arabic nahw.

Now I have the answer

PS: I was planning to continue my other thread but I will like to focus on one question and that is the salam/islam relationship from the grammar/dictionary point of view.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".