69 million page views

If the government can get it right, can the Leftist media be far behind?

Reader comment on item: The Pentagon Looks at the Koran

Submitted by Dr RJP (United States), Oct 2, 2006 at 14:57

The answer is, "The Left is too far behind to catch up to reality."

I agree that it is noteworthy for a governent agency to break away from the "acts of desperation" garbage used to formerely describe these self-serving killers and call a spade a spade. My only beef is that they continue to call them "Suicide bombings" instead of their real name, "Homicide bombings."

Calking what they do "a selfless sacrifice" is a total misnomer because they do it for personal gain and glory first and foremost. Secondly, many of these human bombs are young Muslim men characterised as being lnoers. You will not find any Muslim heads of households among their ranks. The homicide bomber has been thoroughly brainwashed into hating the West, viewing Jews and Christians as subhuman, and thinking that martyrdom is his only purpose in life, and his only way to curry favor with Allah.

The problem is that given how often killing infidels is mentioned in the Koran, brainwashing seems to be is a pretty easy task. Note, if you will, that the very last thing an Islamic militant leader wants to do is martyr himself. Au contraire! He wants very miuch to stay alive and enjoy the fruits of this world rather than giving all that up for a promised pornographic heaven.

In spite of all the evidence to the contrary, Muslims continue to complain that (a) Islam is really a religion of peace, and that (b) homicide bombers are not following the Koran or true Islam, and that (3) Muslims should not be stereootyped as savage killers, My local newspaper frequently runs letters from Muslims on their Opinion page complaining that Westerners just do not understand Islam, and therefore we should keep our comments to ourselves.

If you have read my many comments on this website, you know that I am not one to keep anything to myself when I hear condescending, two-faced, lying anti-Semitic rhetoric. The "You don't know Jack about Islam," is their patented debate killer, and I am sick and tired of hearing it every time I present an opposing viewpoint.

I am also royally ticked off at our local newspaper for refusing to publish my rebuttals to all of the negative propaganda spread about America, the Pope, Jews, and Israel.

The irony is that many Westerners know MORE about what is in the Koran than the self-professed Koran experts. It is an insult to our intelligence to say that we take quotes from the Koran out of context to support our arguments, or misinterpret them. What part of "Kill Jews wherever they hide," did we miss?

Muslim apologists like to steer ant debate about Islam away from the bad parts and focus only on the good parts. When you confront Muslim apologist about some of the most vile statements ever made in a holy book, their unanimous response is to dig deep into Western history to come up with atypical events in the Western world like the Crusades or the Spanish Inquisition or slavery in pre-Civil War America,

Apparently, the concept of "Two wrongs do not make a right," has no parallel in Islam. Judt the other day, I read a letter written to World Net Daily's Opinion page claiming that suicide attacks are not just limited to Islam, but have occrred in World War II.

This ia a typical defense by Muslims and liberals to mollify the wanton destruction wrought by modern-day bombers. The key fact that is completely lost on these morons is that violent acts like homicide bombing, forced-conversions, ethnic cleansing, honor killings, and imperialistic conquest of non-Muslim land has continued unabated for 1,400 years while all of the bad stuff done by whites (like the Inquisition), ended 700 to 800 years ago.

Europeans and Americas changed their eays a long time ago. They have adapted to the demands of the 21st Century, have repeatedly apologized and repented for all of their past transgressions, and are committed to establishing world peace for some time.

On the flip side, Islam cannot escape its warlike roots, and the quest to turn the entire world into one giant Caliph ruled by Sha'ria Law is being spearheaded deep into American interests by modern day jihadists and Mohammed wannabes.

Yes, while it is true that the majority of homicide bombers and jihadists come from the Shia and the Wahabbist sects of islam, even the most secular Muslim is still prone to denegrate Jews, Christians, and other Westerners.

Muslims who are friendly to the West and who do not have a desire to conquer it, have actively chosen to ignore the calls to do so within their own holy scriptures. In other words, people are nice IN SPITE OF Islam, and not BECAUSE OF IT.

So, please do not tell me that I do not understand Islam or are ignorant of it. I know it way too well, and IMHO, the ones who know the least about Islam are its followers because they have been taught only the G-rated, santized version -- the one that purposefully excludes its bloody history of conquest and exhortations to kill infidels -- and the one that has the disclaimer about radical Muslims not being "True Muslims."

According to the radical Muslims, it is they who are being true to the faith, and everyone else is a heretic anda hypocrite.

So what is True Islam? An oxymoron that's what. Don't tell me that I do not understand Islam. Instead, please tell me how some Muslims can be benevolent to others regardless of their race religion, color, or creed, while other Muslims can be malevolent to all those who do not think like they do -- including other Muslims?

There is a very simple reason as to why Muslims cannot agree on what is True Islam, and that is because there are chapters in the Koran that are totally contradictory and reflect how the practices of Islam were very situational and never set in stone by their god from their very inception.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Next Comment >>

Reader comments (113) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1Making Pentagon's task easier [175 words]B.N.GururajFeb 28, 2009 09:52151341
1lawful Islam -the real danger [147 words]RadovanJun 17, 2007 22:3698933
1true islam. [80 words]muslimMar 11, 2009 17:2298933
1True Islam?? [140 words]KevinOct 1, 2009 17:0298933
1Bogus war on terror [202 words]johnDec 26, 2006 09:1870587
1Pentagon is waking up to the reality, but... [1129 words]MohanNov 1, 2006 11:5464998
Can Islam be reformed? [88 words]Jon PurizhanskyNov 8, 2006 19:2564998
Bravo Mohan!!!! [308 words]BettyNov 26, 2006 18:3964998
1War on Islam has to be of Ideas [254 words]B.N.GururajMar 2, 2009 22:3764998
1Islam the motivation of terrorism (The quran, the hadith, and the sunnah) [69 words]Kelvan KamOct 24, 2006 18:5264393
a pointless debate [67 words]yahecurbOct 24, 2006 10:2264332
It makes all of the difference [158 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 28, 2006 03:5164332
Only 5 Years? [32 words]Edwin F. BuckleyOct 16, 2006 16:5560586
WRONG END OF THE HORSE [143 words]DONVANOct 13, 2006 15:4060253
Yeah with many Ulema giving you different intepretation islam will never "wind up" with the facts [96 words]Kelvan KamOct 14, 2006 03:3060253
excellent point... [96 words]donvanOct 16, 2006 09:1860253
They may actually get it one of these days [174 words]Peter HerzOct 12, 2006 17:1560047
1Satanic verses are Ibn Ishaq page 161 ff [332 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 12, 2006 18:4760047
Will the Pentagon also take on the United States Supreme Court? [211 words]AkbarOct 10, 2006 15:3559630
Is not unconstitutional to remove the image of Muhammad. [125 words]Kelvan KamOct 11, 2006 00:1559630
Good point Akbar,almost [99 words]donvanOct 18, 2006 17:2759630
Crusades should be relaunched [34 words]jack hawkinsOct 8, 2006 11:2959299
The Crusades continue! [269 words]AkbarOct 6, 2006 11:0959129
Koran [268 words]RamaOct 8, 2006 07:5359129
Resuming the Crusades? [109 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 9, 2006 15:4759129
No to Turkey in the European Union [45 words]Octavio JohansonOct 9, 2006 17:0859129
Resuming the Crusades [90 words]akbarOct 9, 2006 19:0059129
European Union vs. Turkey [45 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 9, 2006 21:1859129
1If the Crusades WERE Continuing.... [155 words]El CidOct 13, 2006 17:4459129
Reply to Akbar on the Bible [422 words]Peter J. HerzOct 14, 2006 16:0559129
You don't have to worry, there will be no EU left soon [83 words]OctavianNov 3, 2006 00:0059129
have a clean europe...have a turkey out of europe! [44 words]mikeDec 24, 2006 18:3259129
1Yeah, Mike! [87 words]OctavioDec 25, 2006 17:1959129
1No Turkey [25 words]OctavioDec 25, 2006 17:2259129
For how long did the Pentagon stare at the Koran? [504 words]FahadOct 6, 2006 07:5859107
Definition of Jihad [389 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 10, 2006 03:0559107
Henrik, get a better translation, please [473 words]FahadOct 11, 2006 08:0459107
My translation is as official as it gets! [139 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 11, 2006 17:1159107
1Correction [308 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 11, 2006 17:2659107
Did the Pentagon really look at the Quran at all? [237 words]FahadOct 11, 2006 18:5859107
1For Fahad and his lesson in the Arabic langauge and quranic ta'weel! [252 words]dhimmi no moreOct 11, 2006 19:4759107
Quran does not belong to the Saudis [406 words]FahadOct 12, 2006 07:2759107
1For Fahad and suicide in the Qur'an and the sira and the hadith and other sordid matters! [351 words]dhimmi no moreOct 12, 2006 13:1559107
1For Fahad and suicide in the Qur'an and the sira and the hadith and other sordid matters part deux! [37 words]dhimmi no moreOct 12, 2006 18:3159107
References from the Quran? [321 words]FahadOct 12, 2006 20:5159107
1For Fahad: and Arabian imperialism! [220 words]dhimmi no moreOct 13, 2006 06:5659107
1For Henrik: You are doing a good job! [138 words]dhimmi no moreOct 13, 2006 07:1259107
For Fahad: bogus claims and translation of Quran 4:95 part deux! [299 words]dhimmi no moreOct 13, 2006 15:0059107
1For fahad: and Saudi transaltions of the Qur'an [158 words]dhimmi no moreOct 13, 2006 15:1659107
1For Fahad: and his bogus claims! [74 words]dhimmi no moreOct 13, 2006 17:0959107
For Fahad: and his bogus claims part deux! [36 words]dhimmi no moreOct 13, 2006 17:2259107
1For fahad: your claims are bogus! [28 words]dhimmi no moreOct 13, 2006 17:3759107
For the madrassa students [151 words]FahadOct 13, 2006 19:3459107
1Thanks, pal! [60 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 14, 2006 06:5659107
1For Fahad: and his bogus claims and assertions! [682 words]dhimmi no moreOct 14, 2006 08:5359107
1To dhimmi no more [185 words]VijayOct 14, 2006 09:4959107
1For Fahad: bogus claims and "fight in the cause of Allah" part deux [745 words]dhimmi no moreOct 14, 2006 16:1559107
For "dhimmi no more" , the madrassa man. [568 words]FahadOct 14, 2006 21:3359107
1For Fahad and the words: Muqatil and Mujahid and bogus claims [74 words]dhimmi no moreOct 15, 2006 07:4159107
1For Vijay: Thank you [176 words]dhimmi no moreOct 15, 2006 08:0359107
1For Fahad: and the fantasy continues part deux! [157 words]dhimmi no moreOct 15, 2006 08:2659107
2For Fahd/Fahad: Qur'an 2:216 revisited and the fantasy continues part trois! [482 words]dhimmi no moreOct 15, 2006 15:3659107
1For Fahad: and more fantasy part cinq! [208 words]dhimmi no moreOct 15, 2006 16:3659107
1Jihad means WAR! [77 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 16, 2006 03:2859107
Meaning of any word [241 words]VijayOct 20, 2006 09:4559107
meaning of Jihad [180 words]aliJul 17, 2007 09:4559107
What Islamic scripture says about Jihad [527 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenJul 21, 2007 16:1159107
Some questions for Fahad [298 words]Monte GardnerDec 1, 2007 22:0659107
Jihaad is OK if its in "self defence" [354 words]Monte GardnerDec 1, 2007 22:1759107
1Pentagon Looks at the Qur'an [131 words]InfidelOct 5, 2006 13:4759025
I agree [338 words]Stanley LivingstoneOct 5, 2006 10:3759017
suicide [35 words]Cliff MattisOct 4, 2006 23:0158975
Death in battle is not suicide [551 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 6, 2006 05:0058975
Finally! Finally [16 words]Vinod KumarOct 4, 2006 19:1258955
Now What [87 words]James BigaOct 4, 2006 11:4158905
For how long did the Pentagon stare at the Koran?! [511 words]FahadOct 4, 2006 06:4758870
1Spending your property and life in Allah's Cause [1026 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 9, 2006 02:3158870
Answer the question [196 words]FahadOct 9, 2006 18:5358870
3Fighting in Allah's cause [1633 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 10, 2006 17:4658870
the real truth [602 words]nadraOct 7, 2010 01:2158870
at last you find it!!! [190 words]psOct 4, 2006 03:3458859
voa [31 words]cyrusOct 3, 2006 15:5158770
here is the thing [121 words]BobOct 3, 2006 11:5158739
I completely agree with you (EOM) [5 words]sarah simsOct 5, 2006 08:3958739
1FINALLY [205 words]dfwhiteOct 2, 2006 19:1358639
What next? [57 words]VijayOct 2, 2006 15:4958618
2Great. Now read Hadith as well to nail the coffin. [108 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 2, 2006 15:2058615
Henrik Ræder Clausen, Qur'an not jumbled or is it [212 words]InfidelOct 3, 2006 18:0058615
Is the Koran jumbled? [94 words]VinodguptOct 4, 2006 19:0958615
Is the Koran Jumbled [12 words]RamaOct 8, 2006 09:1958615
With the problem enshrined in the Quran.... [83 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
MontyOct 2, 2006 15:0858612
If the government can get it right, can the Leftist media be far behind? [1005 words]Dr RJPOct 2, 2006 14:5758611
1What good parts? [64 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 3, 2006 11:1158611
1Answer to Henrik: "Whatever they take out of context from the Koran that sounds good...." [242 words]Dr RJPOct 3, 2006 16:2158611
1Attention dr. RJP [70 words]Ephraim BielefeldtOct 4, 2006 09:0958611
1The Koran [347 words]Vinod KumarOct 4, 2006 12:2858611
1Muhammad purchased his access to Jewish scriptures [163 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 5, 2006 03:2658611
1Jumbled Koran [220 words]RamaOct 6, 2006 12:2458611
1Distorsions in Koran [191 words]Act NowOct 7, 2006 11:5358611
Islam is the best path to follow. [92 words]akbarOct 7, 2006 16:4558611
Muhammad purchasing material for revelations [255 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 7, 2006 21:0058611
1Jumbled Koran [204 words]RamaOct 8, 2006 00:4958611
1Jumbled Koran [307 words]RamaOct 8, 2006 07:4458611
1Jumbled Koran [340 words]RamaOct 8, 2006 09:1658611
Rama you are mistaken [123 words]spOct 9, 2006 04:5758611
Purchasing revelations -- Clausen [88 words]Act NowOct 9, 2006 13:1958611
1...Prophet Mohammed [51 words]MofidiOct 10, 2006 03:5458611
Mislead you SP [73 words]SP you have misread the titleOct 10, 2006 09:2358611
Islam under the Prophet Muhammad [146 words]AkbarOct 10, 2006 15:5458611
1Arab history [979 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenOct 10, 2006 18:3258611
Read my comments [11 words]akbarOct 10, 2006 22:0858611
1For Akbar: and you must learn the sordid history of early islam! [140 words]dhimmi no moreOct 28, 2006 14:1058611
1Have u ever known Muhammad(swt) [257 words]advisorJun 18, 2009 13:5858611

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)