Our dear Samer is saying that if the corrupted Bible is violent then why not the Qur'an?

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), May 22, 2008 at 06:16

Our dear samer wrote

>seems you are corrupt like your ingeel (Bible)

Oh let me see and you our dear Samer is corrupt like your Qur-an where we cannot even know for example if MLK in surat al-fatiha is maaliki or maliki as Muhammad could only have heard it as one or the other and the real Quranic corruption is Qur'an 53:32

Now could you tell me where can I find your so called corruption in the Bible? The folllowing will not be regarded as evidence:

1. Because Allah says so

2. wikipedia

3. Pakistani Muslim web sites

4. My stupid Mullah says so

5. Our dear Mr Naik (aka Mr Sexual intercourse) said so

And I'm not even Christian

>All mentioned above is corruption

Mentioned Above? Where? Well is this more delusions?

>you congratulate me for something I did not say - you must be insane

No let me repeat what you wrote and I'm paraphrasing it: If the corrupted Bible is violent then what is your probelm with the fact that the Qur'an is violent? It seems that I need to report you to the people in the UAE as they do not like anyone to say that the Qur'an is violent.

>my decision not to reply to you was correct -

Then why did you reply?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".