No proof "Khurram". More babble.

Submitted by kman (United States), Nov 8, 2008 at 19:29

Your predecessor proved nothing. You have proved your own emptiness by never being able to post back to anyone who proves the hollowness and base degenerance of what you have bought into.

Anybody who could read both Jesus Christ and and your "prophet" would easily choose the former - Jesus Christ. I know I have to spell it out to you.

You post back and forth to yourself and, are never able to address anyone else's issues with any of Islam. Islam has vastly proved itslef in the very recent and extended history.

You believe in hatred and the right to express that hatred to the glory of Satan in every abominable fashion that hatreds have always expressed it.

Go ahead and post directly back to me after you have read both the Bible and the incredibly corrupted plagiarism of it - the Quran. When you have read the Bible as I have much of your Quran, you will see how ludicrous a lie you have believed in.

I don't put myself on any pedestal. Jesus Christ reached down and pulled me out of the mud. Unlike your "god', he didn't put a gun to my head. He also, gave me choice. I could pick the way that would bring hardship and devotion to righteousness, truth, and everyone's right to choice.

Or, let's see, I could buy into your way and have no claim to truth, righteousness, and no choice for anyone.

Go ahead. Surprise me and post back with your vast knowledge of where Jesus Christ is wrong. That would be a "proof" of my every claim being wrong and yours right.

You ... have no answers. So, you will not answer me with anything but a title that will look like you have answered me.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".