Shut down the Voice of Amreeka !

Submitted by Ianus (Poland), Mar 15, 2009 at 14:48

Hi, wileysnakeskins !

You wrote :

> If the Voice of America fails to promote the true ideals and discussions of American populace in regards to islam and the war on islamic terror and spouts the false impressions needed by the Brotherhoods orgainizations, it literally takes part in the destruction of the United States and it's Constitution by the Muslim Brotherhood puppets. Therefore guilty of Treason against the State. Close the VOA or completely clean the board of it's employees who take this stand against their own government, constitution and culture.<

It reminds me closely of the judicious advice given to the British conservatives concerning the VOA's notorious prototype - the BBC :

> On the first day of your government, you should close down the BBC. You
should take it off air. You should disclaim its copyrights. You should
throw all its staff into the street. You should not try to privatise the
BBC. This would simply be to transfer the voice of your enemy from the
public to the private sector, where it might be more effective in its
opposition. You must shut it down - and shut it down at once. You should
do the same with much of the administration.<

http://www.seangabb.co.uk/flcomm/flc181.htm

The same should be done with any station, any newspaper that has undermined the existing Constitutional system by misguiding the Western public about Islam; by promoting dhimmitude; by spreading pro-Islamic lies to hide Islam's real aims of enslaving the West; by receiving financial/moral or political support from Moslem sources. This huge pro-Islamist propaganda machine is as much at the root of the problem as Islam itself. To win Islam has ALWAYS relied on traitors. It was ALWAYS defeated where no traitors were to be found.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".