Oh the Turks poor babies they are humiliated and rejected! The Islamic CRUSADES and other sordid matters

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Dec 19, 2010 at 13:54

Our dear Michel and his litlle zummara (noise maker) is back with more

>Turks feel humiliated and rejected,

And they deserve it

>then in typical human response, start to feel resentment themselves.

Hello: when some one is angry he/she is angry at themselves and if you happen to be in their way then you will be blamed! The worst enemy of the Turks are themselves and their lies

In that sense DnM works right into the hands of those, who still herald Salahaddin's battles against the crusaders.

Hello: you just told us in response of reminding you about past the past atrocities of the truks to forget this ancient history or did you forget? so may be you should tell the likes of Tariq ramadan el-ikhwani to get over the crusades too

But wait the old Aristotelian logic comes back to hunt ignorant people like you as in "if the Gods created this creation then who really created the gods"? So who really created the gods mr Einstein? and we owe it to the Greeks and to the Western Civilization

.So why did we have the crusades? Let me help you it was imperialism and colonialism number one but it was also to get rid of Muslims and Arabs that INVADED the holy land right mr Einstein?

So why did we have the Islamic CRUSADES and the Arab invasion of the Middle East in 633CE that was Christian and Jewish?

Let me help you:

1. The Arabs loved to invade and collect ghanima or booty

2. Their Allah told them to invade and he declared in the Qur'an that 1/5 of the booty must go to him so how can we get all that booty to him? any guesses?

3. This means that the Arab Crusades in 633CE is also imperialism and colonialism

4. All the European Christians did was to try and recover what Christians in the Middle East have lost and do you know? Allah approves in the Qur'an of the likes of the crusades because he tell us that if attacked then you can fight back and with no one attacking the Arabs in 633CE not the Greeks and not the Persians it means that the Arab invasion of the Middle East was aginst Allah's will! So get and tell Muslims that the Arab invasion of the Middle east was against Allah's will and let us see what they say

5. The poor victims of the crusades be it Jews or Middle East Christians or those that converted to Islam and became wannabe Arabs were the real victims in Palestine so where were the Arabs to defend even other Muslims? They were no where to be found and this was based of the Quranic doctrine of al-qada' wa al-qadr and it is all the will of Allah! So was it the will of Allah?

6. The imperialist Arabs did not care about the crusades until the crusaders started to attack their caravans and their trade! I'm Adam Smith must be turing in his grave you see our dear Michel it is all about the money and brutalizing innocent people

7. Salah al-Deen al-Ayybi was a Kurd and he was not even an Arab so where were the Arabs? Doing what they always did best: rape and enslave and collect al-jizya How disgusting

So when you have a Muslim whining about the crusades you tell them the above

Shame on you for repeating this utter nonsense

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".