|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Islam is and was a religion of war AND slaveryReader comment on item: My Optimism About Europe Submitted by James (United Kingdom), Mar 12, 2011 at 10:13 Ibn Ishaq's Life of Mohammed is the foundation for knowledge about Mohammed - it was the first biography about Mohammed, and was written by a well-respected muslim. 37 of the chapter titles contain words such as "raid", "battle", "assassination", etc. It is quite simply one of the most gigantic lies in history to assert that "Mohammed was a man of peace". Mohammed deserves comparison with Stalin or Hitler, and not with Christ or Buddha. Latter day "moderate" muslims attempt to rubbish the reliability of Ishaq, citing Ibn Hisham instead. But Hisham simply edited Ishaq to remove those reports that showed Mohammed to be a war-monger and slaver. But for hundreds of years Ibn Ishaq was well-regarded as a historian/biographer (if not as a foundation for sharia law/fiqh). Whilst christianity spread by appealing to slaves who took it as their religion, islam spread by war and enslavement. The entire african slave trade was built by islam, and when Britain tried to end the slave trade in the 19th century, the muslim slavers took more slaves than ever before. Even the sharia law books that western muslims appeal to (e.g. The Reliance of the Traveller) contain sections on how slaves must be treated in islam. But in typical hypocritical manner, the revisionist translators leave untranslated those sections on the legality of slavery in islam. Modern day islamic jurists like Sultan Hussein Tabandeh (in his Muslim Commentary on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) reject universal human rights and say quite explicitly that under islamic law slavery is a legal condition in islam, but is simply unfashionable at the moment! Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (66) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |