The so called Mullah Abdul Rauf and the 9/11 atrocity and islamic hypocrisy and ignorance

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 25, 2011 at 08:54

Dr. Pipes,

I wanted to bring to your attention an article that was published in the WSJ 2 days before the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 atrocity by no other than the so called Mullah Feisal Abdul Rauf who tells the readers that those that crashed the planes in these big buildings cannot be Muslims because the Qur'an says that:

"The Holy Quran says that whoever kills an innocent, it is as if he has killed all mankind."

Well let us check what the Qur'an really says and for this see Q5:32 where it says

katabna 3ala bani Israel innah man qatala nafsan nighayri nafsin aw fasad fi al-ard fakanama qatala al-nas jami3an or

we wrote for the children of Israel he who kills a soul (read this as person) unless for (the murder) of other soul (read this as person) or for spoiling (read this as mischief) in the land it would be like he killed all of mankind

So the Qur'an is talking about the Jews and not Muslims for sure as Mullah Abdul Rauf is claiming and what a hypocrite

But again shame on the WSJ for not checking the facts and allowing this propagandist to write what he wants

As for the so called Mullah Abdul Rauf it is either he is not aware that the Qur'an is talking about the Jews and not Muslims or that he was hoping that we kuffar cannot read the Qur'an but in this case he would be a liar

Oh there is more he does not seem to be aware that Allah tells Muslims to kill! yes kill in ayat al-sayf or the infamous 9:5

What a hypocrite

For the full article please see

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903596904576514602732108870.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion

The real question what is that annoying woman his wife Daisy Khan doing these days?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".