69 million page views

Israel cannot take the blame for the arab fractioning

Reader comment on item: [Symposium on] The U.S. and Israel
in response to reader comment: What resolution of the palestinian conflict ?

Submitted by sara (United States), Mar 11, 2012 at 19:14

Lars,

I agree with some of your points. I try to remain realistic and practical rather than ideology driven.

You say: "The israeli interest is, that the palestinians cease to be a menace to Israel. Israel is therefore very anxious to agree to the creation of a palestinian state, before the palestinians have recognized the existence of Israel and given up their claim, that palestinian refugees and their descendants should have a right to return to places inside Israel."

Resolution does not mean 'peace' as I believe that is not possible, and it appears that you agree in your last sentence. Stability is much more important than peace and historically, what promotes stability is deterrence. Israel cannot and will not accept these 'refugee returns' as no country in creation has done so in the past, and the line of legitimacy gets blurrier with every stake. Not only this, but an influx of a large mass of Palestiians/Jordanians/Kuwaitis/Egyptians/Lebanese etc. is a laughably thinly veiled attempt to eradicate the Jewish state. They know it and we know it and the world knows it.

"The US interest is to dominate the Middle East. It has no specific interest in solving the palestinian problem, as long as the arabs do not care. And the arabs have never shown much interest in solving the palestinian problem. But if the arabs should join forces against Israel, the US would have to choose. Either a war against the arabs or to abandon Israel."

Well of course the premise makes the answer impossible, since we both know that the arabs will never manage to unite against Israel. In fact the likelihood of Hamas and the PA uniting is might mighty slim, and that in itself puts a stop to all negotiation. Of course, the leftist Israelis are forever making excuses for them and taking the blame for their lack of unification. Yossi Alper just wrote a beautiful piece in which he already blames Israel for the inevitable Intifada that will erupt on a moment's notice. His contention is that Israel needs to DO something to calm the waters between Hamas and PA and make them best buddies. Why is it Israel's responsibility? He thinks that if Israel does not do this (and you and I hopefully agree that this happening is highly unlikely), then Israel must accept the consequences of the frustration building among the palestinians and their wrath will be unleashed in another scapegoating move. Blame Israel for the fact that they are unable to come together politically or socially. That is the height of nerve to me. To be so arrogant as to believe that anything Israel does actually could matter between the arab feuds.

"On the other hand, the US has no interest to abandon Israel now, because this would be seen as a sign of weakness. Therefore, the US has adopted a policy, where it orally supports peace between israelis and palestinians without doing anything, which would promote the peace process."

I am not sure where you get your analysis points from. The US will not abandon Israel because it is not in their strategic interest to do so. Having a faithful ally in the ME is too valuable, and as a bonus they get to use the military prowess rather than their own when needed. But I agree that there has been a very long and continuous stand-off where the US is careful not to seem too supportive of any side, regardless of which party was in office at the time.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (34) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Does America want to be ruled by Israeli policy decisions? [65 words]Gary AndersonJun 12, 2012 14:35196259
US policy in the Middle East [141 words]peterrApr 28, 2012 04:48195297
1Our Hero [83 words]John BullockApr 26, 2012 13:44195268
Support For Israel [16 words]CliffordApr 18, 2012 20:18195177
Reason for U.S.-Israeli alliance [98 words]Jesse BakerApr 17, 2012 20:50195143
1Nicely presented [19 words]jackyApr 16, 2012 08:02195112
Thoughts [93 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Anon.Apr 15, 2012 23:44195105
1Proactive Israelis & Jews - Resettlement of Palestinians [221 words]LudvikusApr 7, 2012 16:22195023
1military alliance unclear [179 words]mythApr 6, 2012 16:45195008
[Symposium on] The U.S. and Israel [42 words]Julius WatlerApr 15, 2012 13:44195008
At the center of it all [93 words]William EastApr 3, 2012 00:19194924
1United States has a history [83 words]charles josephApr 1, 2012 15:44194903
Disconfort about being affiliated [80 words]AlmaMar 31, 2012 06:01194878
It is little comfort [96 words]saraMar 14, 2012 18:54194389
1The oil barrier [168 words]Paul B.Mar 13, 2012 16:28194345
Things in Common [41 words]Jay1Mar 11, 2012 22:10194276
The talk vs the reality [108 words]BJMar 11, 2012 20:15194271
1What common interests ? [295 words]Lars NielsenMar 8, 2012 03:22194146
A Common Interest of Mutual Respect of Other's Rights to Sovereignty - Survival [335 words]M. ToveyMar 9, 2012 16:17194146
Common interests [88 words]Lars NielsenMar 10, 2012 03:15194146
Of course they share common interests [91 words]saraMar 10, 2012 17:51194146
What resolution of the palestinian conflict ? [223 words]Lars NielsenMar 11, 2012 07:36194146
1Israel cannot take the blame for the arab fractioning [588 words]saraMar 11, 2012 19:14194146
Common Interests in Uncommon Circumstances [416 words]M. ToveyMar 12, 2012 11:58194146
Points taken [327 words]Lars NielsenMar 13, 2012 11:41194146
1True common interests [366 words]Jay B.Mar 13, 2012 17:46194146
4Why would they fight for Israel? [406 words]saraMar 13, 2012 20:55194146
Obama has no such ideals [139 words]Y Brandstetter MDApr 23, 2012 01:54194146
What did you do in the war dad? [18 words]Uneducated bozoMay 26, 2012 14:16194146
What Dad and the Uncles Did Evidently are Lost National Memories [96 words]M. ToveyJun 4, 2012 14:01194146
Israel and USA as Obama does not see [285 words]NuritGMar 8, 2012 01:22194134
U.S.Policy toward Israel [22 words]Dannel R. BallesterosMar 7, 2012 12:48194090
Israel and America are more like joined twins. [69 words]Phil GreendMar 6, 2012 19:35194035
3U. S. Cannot Afford to be an Obstruction to Israel's Right of Defense [431 words]M. ToveyMar 6, 2012 12:59194011

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)