A weltanschung built on myriad assumptions is a precarious one

Submitted by the Grand Infidel of Kaffiristan (Australia), Apr 4, 2012 at 20:51

Mr Abdullah further demonstrates his great gift at making nonsensical statements:

"Sir of all that you said you had no clear answer to nothing that I said."

A double negative which translates to a positive. But which bits in all the replies that you received did you not understand? But in any case - that's entirely your purely subjective evaluation. No one can make you see anything. You're especially handicapped when you start with the premise that what you already think you know is all there is to know and what you think you already know is 100% true.

Have you any clear answers to points myself and others have put forward by the way?

"Most Christians like yourself ..."

Another massive assumption - who said I am a Christian?

"...are emotional believers ..."

what does that mean?

"...and not believer of knowledge of that which they believe."

It gets even worse! Someone is not a believer of something that they believe???

"..I'm in a rush at this moment but I will leave you something to chew on."

Oh, thank you, sensei.

"...It says Jesus was out of the house of David (Bloodline). How could that be?"

What is 'it'? The Bible? Meaning that 2000 years ago his mother's family was descended from a Jewish king? And that Jesus was a Jew? Is that a preposterous supposition for you somehow? The Koran says Mo flew on white peacock-tailed horse with wings a thousand miles in a few seconds. But of course - that IS true for you isn't it?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".